|
|||||||||||
|
Re: How would you provide a 554 rejection notice for spam?
From: Rick Macdougall <rickm(at)ummm-beer.com>
Date: Tue Jul 31 2007 - 17:48:30 EDT
mouss wrote:
>> >> simscan correctly uses an SMTP REJECT (55x code during the smtp >> conversation) and it is also possible to use custom reject messages >> with simscan so the sender, if any, knows exactly why the message was >> rejected. >> >> I have yet to see a good implementation of this in Postfix or >> Sendmail, and is one of the reasons I stick with Qmail. > > running SA at smtp time requires that the client does not timeout. so > you'd better scan fast! you're also more subject to DOS (your smtp > listeners are busy). compare this to queue and filter... We do, 4 back end spamd machines for 4 external MX machines. >> >> Having to /dev/null spam and/or viruses to the end user is even worse >> IMHO (as an ISP, it might be acceptable in an office env where you can >> train the users to look at spam or virus folders). > > Reject (not bounce) is acceptable, but you'd better configure your > filter correctly. If I get a reject from you for a legitimate mail I > sent, you will just make yourself ridiculous... It also delays > legitimate mail (because I have to resend). > We only REJECT very high scoring spams or viruses, I haven't seen an FP on the rejecting yet. > Agree completely. Regards, Rick Received on Tue Jul 31 17:49:18 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 22 2007 - 11:49:21 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||