|
|
| Applications |
| Mailing Lists |
| Miscellaneous |
| Operating Systems |
| Programming |
Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA?
From: Matthias Haegele <mhaegele(at)linuxrocks.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu Aug 16 2007 - 02:32:17 EDT
>
>
> I do not.
>
> (greet-pause of 5 seconds; zen and dsbl as blacklists; local access type
> blocks; dangerous attachment filename blocker; and then clamav with
> Sanesecurity, MSRBL, MBL signatures; all of those _reject_ messages
> during the SMTP session before Spam Assassin gets to see them)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2007 - 02:32:17 EDT
John Rudd schrieb:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>> As opposed to preprocessing before using SA to reduce the load. (ie. >> using blacklist and whitelist before SA) >> >>
>
>
> I do not.
>
> (greet-pause of 5 seconds; zen and dsbl as blacklists; local access type
> blocks; dangerous attachment filename blocker; and then clamav with
> Sanesecurity, MSRBL, MBL signatures; all of those _reject_ messages
> during the SMTP session before Spam Assassin gets to see them)
Nearly same setup as John. If you have the opportunity to block at MTA
level i think u *really should do this*. (Its around 80% rejects here).
Additionaly i block some TLDs like .ar|br|cl|ru|pl|jp|hu which i dont
have regular mail contact here ...
btw: MTA is Postfix.
-- Grüsse/Greetings MH Dont send mail to: ubecatcher@linuxrocks.dyndns.org --Received on Thu Aug 16 02:31:53 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 24 2007 - 07:16:31 EDT
|
Contact Us Legal Notices Order Services Online Pantek Home Privacy Policy IT news Site Map Pantek Library |