|
|||||||||||
|
Re: SPF-Compliant Spam
From: Luis Hernán Otegui <luis.otegui(at)gmail.com>
Date: Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:49:23 EDT
Without going into technical arguments about your practices, you're treating us who don't do as you do as mere stupids. And that, IMHO, is a terrible simplification. If you find you're in the right path FOR YOUR SITUATION, that's ok with me. But you CANNOT become a fanatic and begin yelling to the rest of us that we're going to hell because we don't agree with you. Qouting Einstein, "Only a fool confuses reality with the model. Such a simplification leads to a narrow mind"... Now, on the technical hand, SPF is an anti-forgery tool, as was said earlier in this discussion. I publish my records for anyone to know if a message which claims to come from my servers (or at least, my domain) is legit or not. If you run majordomo mor mailman based lists, the forwarding issue goes down... Or you could just rewrite your SPF records to include the domains that get forwarded usually, as I do between the two major domains I manage... Peace, Luis -- ------------------------------------------------- GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You... Linux Registered User #448382. When I grow up, I wanna be like Theo... -------------------------------------------------Received on Mon Aug 27 17:50:06 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 00:52:19 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||