Re: spamd and plugins

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

jonathan schrieb:

> I'm more concerned about the overhead of calling spamassassin over and
> over from within amavis. Some suggest three or four times better
> performance using spamc/d over calling the spamassassin command directly
> (which is (i believe) what amavis does). Being able to handle

Amavisd does not use the spamassassin command line binary, but:

• --- cut --- package Amavis::SpamControl; [..] use Mail::SpamAssassin;
• --- cut ---

In the logfile of amavisd, you'll also see something like:

| Aug 30 20:26:11 amavis[27896]: Module Mail::SpamAssassin 3.002000

> substantially more messages would help us quite a bit as our incoming
> mail volume is rapidly on the rise.
>
> If I've got loadplugin commands in my various custom .cf files, will
> these be properly heeded by spamd?

If the custom .cf file are in a location that is read by your spamd process, yes.

• -- Matthias -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

Do you need help?
In addition to our free technical library, Pantek provides professional IT services to companies who utilize Open Source software: Learn more about Pantek's Technical Support offerings Place an order for 24/7/365 Technical Support here Learn more about Pantek, who we are, and what we do Chat with a Live Operator Related spamassassin.apache.org Links users Request more information about Pantek

iD8DBQFG1wwqxbHw2nyi/okRAqq7AKCvhlJA1qdtBKcDDLbLfjbLROsbNQCfYNHk J/RhHuegL0cH2WRwOTPrknQ=
=hZMI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Thu Aug 30 14:28:42 2007