RE: Support - spamassassin

At 08:15 31-08-2007, Tony Le Piane wrote:
>That was a typo when I copied .. its actually -0400
>
>I have compared it to other SMTP headers and don't see any differences.
>Also looked at RFC 2822 and we comply.

This is the INVALID_DATE rule:

Date !~
/^\s*(?:(?i:Mon|Tue|Wed|Thu|Fri|Sat|Sun),\s)?\s*(?:[12]\d|3[01]|0?[1-9])\s+(?i:Jan|Feb|Ma[ry]|Apr|Ju[nl]|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)\s+(?:19[7-9]\d|2\d{3})\s+(?:[01]?\d|2[0-3])\:[0-5]\d(?::(?:[0-5]\d|60))?\s+(?:[AP]M\s+)?(?:[+-][0-9]{4}|UT|[A-Z]{2,3}T)(?:\s+\(.*\))?\s*$/ [if-unset: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:41:57 +0200]

You can test your Date header against that.

>As mentioned we been running this services for over 5 years and no all of a
>sudden we get classified as spam. I don't get it.

That rule only scores 1.8 points. Your message must be hitting other rules as well for it to be classified as spam.

Regards,
-sm Received on Fri Aug 31 12:08:36 2007