Hosting Provided By

RE: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822

From: Per Jessen <per(at)computer.org>
Date: Fri Aug 31 2007 - 15:35:29 EDT

Dan Barker wrote:

> Hold on! If you are USING the affected system, then since you replied
> to me directly instead of through the list, I have your message
> headers, and they went through my SpamAssassin, and did not trigger
> the INVALID_DATE rule.

Yep, same here. The Date header looks fine to me.

/Per Jessen, ZÃ¼rich Received on Fri Aug 31 15:36:19 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: jidanni(at)jidanni.org: "Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process"
Previous message: Bret Miller: "Parsing Received Headers"
In reply to: Dan Barker: "RE: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822"
Next in thread: Matt Kettler: "Re: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 20:10:00 EDT