RE: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:danm@prime.gushi.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2007 7:14 AM
> To: Rob McEwen
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF,
> DKIM, Ironport,
>
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Rob McEwen wrote:
>
> > Therefore, I recommend that you re-think your choices here! Don't let
> your
> > quest for "guaranteed long-term perfection" keep you from making
> > **substantial** progress today!
>
> Rob,
>
> Then help rally the SA team to include those RBLs that you mentioned in
> the stock config.
>
> Also, rally them to update the documentation on the wiki on how to
> configure SA for third-party DNSBL's, because it
> blows (and refers to years-old versions of SA). Yes, I know the point of
> a wiki is that ANYONE can update it, but I'm not about to update it with
> information I don't understand for certain.

You should update the Wiki nevertheless and append a disclaimer of sorts! Choosing not to update in fear of appearing clueless is just lame! If you believe that what you are posting is halfway valid, then someone else can update. This is the sole function of a Wiki as otherwise there'd be no need for an UPDATE function!!!

.
.
.