|
|||||||||||
|
Re: [sa-list] Re: Advice on MTA blacklist
From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin <danm(at)prime.gushi.org>
Date: Thu Oct 11 2007 - 00:53:43 EDT
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Jo Rhett wrote: Assuming sendmail (and we don't make such assumptions), you can specify different options per-port, such that you don't need to run "two" mail servers. For example, I have no less than seven virtual daemons configured: Submission agents on 587 and 2525, which require auth, and have encryption optional. Also listens on 127.1. A submission agent on 465 (not 645), configured the same way, but with encryption explicit. Standard daemon on port 25 (and yes, it still supports the optional encryption). As a bonus, my own server any port will present a FQDN, signed certificate (not self-signed). I've actually found other servers out there in the wild that do the same, with a valid cert -- I've got my server configured with the CA root certs so it knows which are "true" (this doesn't affect ability to relay or anything, but it's cool to see others are doing it). Of course, all this is wildly off the topic, but hey... -Dan -- "And, a special guest, from the future, miss Ria Pischell. Miss Pischell, as you all know, is the inventor of the Statiophonic Oxygenetic Amplifiagraphaphonadelaverberator, and it's pretty hard to imagine life without one of those. -Rufus, Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------Received on Thu Oct 11 00:54:44 2007 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 04 2008 - 12:19:19 EDT |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||