Hosting Provided By

Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin

From: Kent Borg <kentborg(at)borg.org>
Date: Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:46:17 EDT

I am also running an old version (3.1.7 on Ubuntu 7.04). Between SA and Thunderbird's own spam features, I am detecting something between 75% and 80% of spam. How much better is 3.2.x?

Thanks,

-kb Received on Tue Oct 16 10:47:35 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Martin.Hepworth: "RE: Question about total effective of spamassassin"
Previous message: Rick Macdougall: "Re: uribl.com implementing ACLs"
In reply to: cpayne(at)webmail.magigames.net: "Question about total effective of spamassassin"
Next in thread: Martin.Hepworth: "RE: Question about total effective of spamassassin"
Reply: Martin.Hepworth: "RE: Question about total effective of spamassassin"
Reply: Matus UHLAR - fantomas: "Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin"
Reply: Alex Woick: "Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 04 2008 - 17:02:09 EDT