Mailing List Archive For users@apache.org Aug 2007 By Date

• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 21:41:28 EDT
  • Re: FuzzyOcr misses John Thompson 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 23:06:24 EDT
  • header /^\Q...\E$/m jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 21:13:02 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 15:35:29 EDT
  • RE: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822 Per Jessen 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:50:15 EDT
  • Parsing Received Headers Bret Miller 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:32:58 EDT
  • FuzzyOcr misses John Thompson 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:31:01 EDT
  • RE: Why'd VBounce not hit? Dan Barker 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:12:36 EDT
  • Re: spamd and plugins jonathan 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 12:06:46 EDT
  • RE: Support - spamassassin SM 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 11:20:33 EDT
  • RE: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822 Dan Barker 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 11:15:59 EDT
  • RE: Support - spamassassin Tony Le Piane 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 11:07:08 EDT
  • Re: Support - spamassassin Duane Hill 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 10:59:29 EDT
  • Re: Some thoughts on Baysian Setup... Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 10:54:22 EDT
  • Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822 Tony Le Piane 
• Fri Aug 31 2007 - 10:38:14 EDT
  • Support - spamassassin Tony Le Piane 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 20:11:23 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? maillist 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 19:52:21 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Loren Wilton 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 19:14:25 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? John Rudd 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 18:59:27 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Loren Wilton 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:37:12 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Jerry Durand 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:35:00 EDT
  • Re: Dkfiltrt + Postfix + SPamassassin SM 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:31:29 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Kai Schaetzl 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:30:24 EDT
  • Re: SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:29:09 EDT
  • Re: SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building Jerry Durand 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:24:10 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps haning on win32 Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:21:41 EDT
  • Re: SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building FH 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 16:58:14 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Jeff Eshom 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 14:27:54 EDT
  • Re: spamd and plugins Matthias Leisi 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 14:09:07 EDT
  • Re: spamd and plugins jonathan 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 13:47:01 EDT
  • Re: spamd and plugins Matthias Leisi 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 13:42:09 EDT
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Tejas Jin 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 12:35:14 EDT
  • Re: Hurting Bayes with "(spam)" in the subject line? Micha³ Jêczalik 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 12:07:45 EDT
  • R: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 11:44:24 EDT
  • Hurting Bayes with "(spam)" in the subject line? Clay Davis 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 11:17:30 EDT
  • spamd and plugins jonathan 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 10:59:34 EDT
  • Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Igor Chudov 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:55:08 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Micke Andersson 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:43:27 EDT
  • Re: Usage of journal in Bayesian Filtering. Matt Kettler 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:42:34 EDT
  • Dkfiltrt + Postfix + SPamassassin Thiva Charanasri 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:37:55 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:31:42 EDT
  • FuzzyOcr and spamassassin 3.2.x Paolo De Marco 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:25:46 EDT
  • Re: Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses John D. Hardin 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 08:08:17 EDT
  • Re: chickenpox.cf ham Matthew Newton 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 05:36:28 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 04:14:57 EDT
  • Re: InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Pawe³ Têcza 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 04:12:39 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 04:10:46 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 03:55:12 EDT
  • Usage of journal in Bayesian Filtering. Srilatha 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 03:47:52 EDT
  • Re: InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Pawe³ Têcza 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 00:31:33 EDT
  • Re: Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses Loren Wilton 
• Thu Aug 30 2007 - 00:16:27 EDT
  • Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses Dan Fulbright 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 22:10:27 EDT
  • Re: white_list is not working.....HELP! Matt Kettler 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 20:01:31 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps haning on win32 Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:46:18 EDT
  • spamd keeps haning on win32 MacDonald, Mike 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 18:11:56 EDT
  • Re: Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused mouss 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 17:43:40 EDT
  • Re: SARE fraud ruleset rotted? John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 17:25:44 EDT
  • Re: Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused Simon 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 17:22:05 EDT
  • Re: SARE fraud ruleset rotted? Doc Schneider 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 16:25:49 EDT
  • SARE fraud ruleset rotted? John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 15:19:02 EDT
  • Re: spam reports Michael Grant 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 15:16:37 EDT
  • Re: spam reports Jari Fredriksson 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:58:53 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! SM 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:21:24 EDT
  • Whitelist for misconfigured mail servers (was: Posioned MX is a bad idea) Kenneth Porter 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:00:34 EDT
  • spam reports Michael Grant 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:17:14 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:17:09 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:11:06 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Bowie Bailey 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:06:27 EDT
  • R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea - Some findings Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:05:11 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:32:00 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:27:48 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Bowie Bailey 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:03:37 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:57:52 EDT
  • Re: InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Alex Woick 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:55:24 EDT
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Bowie Bailey 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:39:00 EDT
  • white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:29:13 EDT
  • SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building FH 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 08:44:56 EDT
  • R: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 07:48:10 EDT
  • RE: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Dan Barker 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:59:51 EDT
  • Re: Re: integration with domino....linux vitas1(at)itera.ru 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:55:14 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:44:37 EDT
  • Re: Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused Mark Martinec 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:43:53 EDT
  • R: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:28:26 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Mark Martinec 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:54:50 EDT
  • Re: integration with domino....linux richard venne 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:46:00 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Anthony Peacock 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:29:04 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Wed Aug 29 2007 - 01:58:05 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Aaron Wolfe 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 22:29:56 EDT
  • Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused Simon 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 22:09:02 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 21:59:35 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Andy Dills 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 20:04:41 EDT
  • Re: OT blacklist check Bob Proulx 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 19:53:20 EDT
  • R: Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 19:47:50 EDT
  • R: Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 17:18:20 EDT
  • RE: integration with domino....linux Martin.Hepworth 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 17:00:25 EDT
  • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... John Fleming 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:46:56 EDT
  • Re: integration with domino....linux Matthias Leisi 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:43:28 EDT
  • Re: OT blacklist check Bob McClure Jr 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:41:37 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:31:44 EDT
  • RE: OT blacklist check Jean-Paul Natola 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:20:00 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:12:48 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:58:02 EDT
  • R: R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:47:05 EDT
  • Re: OT blacklist check Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:41:16 EDT
  • Re: R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Theo Van Dinter 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:32:28 EDT
  • Re: R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea mouss 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:24:23 EDT
  • R: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:23:45 EDT
  • Re: chickenpox.cf ham Loren Wilton 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:17:19 EDT
  • RE: OT blacklist check Jerry Durand 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:16:35 EDT
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Loren Wilton 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:10:20 EDT
  • RE: OT blacklist check Dan Barker 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:10:01 EDT
  • chickenpox.cf ham Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:07:15 EDT
  • OT blacklist check Jean-Paul Natola 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:02:05 EDT
  • two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 13:18:54 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 12:35:02 EDT
  • Re: Yet Another Great Idea Loren Wilton 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:55:50 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Anthony Peacock 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:40:21 EDT
  • Re: R: And interesting way to detect spambots Jim Maul 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:39:49 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:36:14 EDT
  • Re: R: And interesting way to detect spambots John D. Hardin 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:24:59 EDT
  • R: And interesting way to detect spambots Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:19:36 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:16:23 EDT
  • R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:14:42 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:12:55 EDT
  • RE: And interesting way to detect spambots Thomas Raef 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:11:26 EDT
  • Re: And interesting way to detect spambots Justin Mason 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:09:14 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:01:52 EDT
  • Re: And interesting way to detect spambots Marc Perkel 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:05:24 EDT
  • R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:59:21 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Michael Parker 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:53:28 EDT
  • And interesting way to detect spambots Marc Perkel 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:49:10 EDT
  • Re: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Theo Van Dinter 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:43:47 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists John Rudd 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:35:45 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:34:48 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:31:18 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Matt Kettler 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:24:58 EDT
  • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:24:01 EDT
  • Storm worm redux Rick Zeman 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:23:02 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists John Rudd 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:15:09 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:12:53 EDT
  • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:10:23 EDT
  • RE: SA Updating Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:07:40 EDT
  • RE: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:01:09 EDT
  • SA Updating Rense Buijen 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:49:44 EDT
  • YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:32:07 EDT
  • integration with domino....linux richard venne 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:25:58 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:18:24 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Mark Martinec 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:15:00 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 08:39:59 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 07:09:55 EDT
  • spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 06:16:22 EDT
  • InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Pawe³ Têcza 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 05:42:02 EDT
  • END OF THREAD (was Re: SPF-Compliant Spam) Justin Mason 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 05:28:59 EDT
  • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 05:22:43 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Justin Mason 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 04:33:37 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Per Jessen 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 02:39:55 EDT
  • Re: completewhois.com Per Jessen 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 02:32:21 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Graham Murray 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 01:52:29 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam David B Funk 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 01:51:54 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Tue Aug 28 2007 - 00:32:23 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 21:04:28 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries jidanni 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 20:56:04 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 20:52:49 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? bgodette(at)idcomm.com 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 19:46:11 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Matt Kettler 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:48:35 EDT
  • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Rick Cooper 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:45:59 EDT
  • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Rick Cooper 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:42:17 EDT
  • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Rick Cooper 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:39:33 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:39:27 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:31:12 EDT
  • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:11:42 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam mouss 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:09:53 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:09:12 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:03:00 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:58:43 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:57:14 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kelson 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:56:41 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:52:48 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:50:04 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:49:23 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:47:37 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:53:34 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:46:52 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:45:55 EDT
  • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:39:57 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Andy Sutton 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:39:07 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Loren Wilton 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:35:13 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] David B Funk 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:32:13 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:30:16 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:29:00 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:28:09 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bill Landry 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:26:12 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:25:12 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists John Rudd 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:09:15 EDT
  • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:04:31 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam j o a r 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:00:37 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 16:50:26 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Loren Wilton 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 16:24:19 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Meng Weng Wong 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:59:42 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:54:05 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:50:45 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:49:12 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:24:56 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:20:13 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: completewhois.com Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:53:24 EDT
  • R: R: completewhois.com Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:46:12 EDT
  • Re: R: completewhois.com Kelson 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:40:02 EDT
  • R: completewhois.com Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:39:28 EDT
  • Re: completewhois.com Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:39:06 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kelson 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:37:06 EDT
  • Re: completewhois.com Loren Wilton 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:30:59 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:22:25 EDT
  • completewhois.com Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:11:43 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John Scully 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:54:08 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Derek Harding 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:37:41 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam j o a r 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:29:45 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] David B Funk 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:11:48 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Graham Murray 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:10:26 EDT
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:59:09 EDT
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:55:23 EDT
  • Re: Whitelisting IP's John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:56:48 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Per Jessen 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:55:16 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Per Jessen 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:52:04 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam mouss 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:42:12 EDT
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:37:18 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Loren Wilton 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:34:13 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Steven Kurylo 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:31:20 EDT
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? Theo Van Dinter 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:24:05 EDT
  • Whitelisting IP's Matt 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:22:41 EDT
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:05:54 EDT
  • where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:11:20 EDT
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:48:06 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:46:51 EDT
  • Re: Some thoughts on Baysian Setup... Chris St. Pierre 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:35:02 EDT
  • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:19:08 EDT
  • Re: False negative OliverScott 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:17:16 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:09:56 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Matt Kettler 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:09:17 EDT
  • Some thoughts on Baysian Setup... OliverScott 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:05:01 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Matt Kettler 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:02:21 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:52:28 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:47:41 EDT
  • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Jason Bertoch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:38:00 EDT
  • False negative FaberK 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:35:39 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Justin Mason 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 16:09:06 EDT
  • FuzzyOCR miss John Thompson 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:27:22 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:26:49 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:19:21 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:14:58 EDT
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Edward Francis Klimowicz 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 08:59:18 EDT
  • SPF-Compliant Spam Jason Bertoch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 08:08:34 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Dave Mifsud 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 07:47:23 EDT
  • using --max-conn-per-child=1 Dan Massey 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 07:00:50 EDT
  • Re: sa-update stuck in July Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 06:19:49 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] martin f krafft 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 06:04:40 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Tony Finch 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:31:21 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea - Challenge Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:31:20 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:27:03 EDT
  • Re: sa-update stuck in July Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:26:21 EDT
  • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 01:24:46 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Mon Aug 27 2007 - 01:05:05 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] DAve 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 23:46:50 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] David B Funk 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 23:47:18 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kenneth Porter 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 21:56:48 EDT
  • Re: sa-update stuck in July jidanni 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 21:39:17 EDT
  • Re: How to query the AWL at an earlier stage for Short Circuit? Matt Kettler 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 20:44:38 EDT
  • Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... John Fleming 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 20:36:55 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea - Challenge Marc Perkel 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 20:31:26 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 19:35:30 EDT
  • How to query the AWL at an earlier stage for Short Circuit? OliverScott 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 16:29:14 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Nikolay Shopik 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:50:18 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Nikolay Shopik 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:39:44 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kenneth Porter 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:37:18 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:36:14 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea John D. Hardin 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:18:46 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Loren Wilton 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 14:02:53 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 13:30:59 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 13:21:46 EDT
  • RE: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Michael Scheidell 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:54:17 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 04:34:24 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Nikolay Shopik 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 17:21:37 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Nikolay Shopik 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 12:31:21 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 10:48:00 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Dave Pooser 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 09:54:16 EDT
  • RE: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 08:49:30 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 08:29:28 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 08:10:17 EDT
  • Re: Bayes DB file locations help Matt Kettler 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:46:22 EDT
  • Re: Combine whitelist_to and whitelist_from users-spamassassin(at)eurower.com 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:31:20 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:18:33 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Tony Finch 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 05:31:15 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl 
• Sun Aug 26 2007 - 03:26:39 EDT
  • Bayes DB file locations help got2go 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 23:34:20 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Matt Kettler 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 23:13:47 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 20:57:59 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Rob McEwen 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 19:58:44 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea John D. Hardin 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:33:46 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:29:50 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Duane Hill 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:21:16 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Rob McEwen 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:14:04 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Dave Pooser 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 17:56:52 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 17:41:58 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] John Rudd 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:51:43 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:42:25 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] John Rudd 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:34:02 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Duane Hill 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:08:27 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] John Rudd 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 15:51:47 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 14:02:11 EDT
  • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 12:39:20 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Tom Ray 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 11:31:15 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: How to stop these? Kai Schaetzl 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 10:51:07 EDT
  • Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 10:04:09 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? mouss 
• Sat Aug 25 2007 - 04:07:29 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 21:00:26 EDT
  • Re: charter.net maillist 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 20:47:06 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Matt Kettler 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 20:45:34 EDT
  • Re: HELO dns resolution Matt Kettler 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 20:38:13 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 19:31:20 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Kai Schaetzl 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 19:19:39 EDT
  • Re: sa-update stuck in July Theo Van Dinter 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 18:58:23 EDT
  • Re: sa-update stuck in July jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 18:43:59 EDT
  • Re: sa-update stuck in July Theo Van Dinter 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:51:57 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:50:02 EDT
  • sa-update stuck in July jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:33:30 EDT
  • reading this list via Gmane, no need for extra copy jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:16:21 EDT
  • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Linooks 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:14:24 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:02:22 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:00:31 EDT
  • HELO dns resolution Nikolay Shopik 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:00:30 EDT
  • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Theo Van Dinter 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 15:43:17 EDT
  • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Linooks 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 15:11:13 EDT
  • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Jari Fredriksson 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:55:34 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Tom Ray 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:50:40 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:12:28 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:05:27 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:56:54 EDT
  • recieving spam from my own domain? Linooks 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:55:00 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? Rick Zeman 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:53:32 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:36:10 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? Loren Wilton 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:27:09 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:55:27 EDT
  • spamd children killed but don't die? Rosenbaum, Larry M. 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:57:23 EDT
  • RE: charter.net Ray Dzek 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:35:50 EDT
  • Re: non-phish corpus? hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:28:58 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 11:05:33 EDT
  • Ipower Webhostig with Spamassasin Kracht, Tim 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 10:56:07 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 10:39:41 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 10:28:07 EDT
  • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 09:48:25 EDT
  • Re: How to stop these? John D. Hardin 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 09:39:55 EDT
  • Ipower webhosting spamassasin itguy 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 09:09:43 EDT
  • How to stop these? Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:53:19 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:47:03 EDT
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:30:22 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Jonn R Taylor 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:07:47 EDT
  • Re: Combine whitelist_to and whitelist_from Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 07:46:10 EDT
  • Combine whitelist_to and whitelist_from users-spamassassin(at)eurower.com 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 07:44:00 EDT
  • report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot 
• Fri Aug 24 2007 - 06:31:34 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Kai Schaetzl 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 23:39:31 EDT
  • Re: charter.net SM 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 23:15:29 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Jonn R Taylor 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:59:11 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Matt Kettler 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:42:59 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Jonn R Taylor 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:35:46 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Matt Kettler 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:34:29 EDT
  • Re: charter.net Matt Kettler 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 21:59:50 EDT
  • charter.net Jonn R Taylor 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 18:31:19 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Blacklist problems!] Kai Schaetzl 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:40:29 EDT
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Dan Barker 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:32:25 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Theo Van Dinter 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:31:42 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:30:09 EDT
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Jari Fredriksson 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:16:18 EDT
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Dan Barker 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 16:32:58 EDT
  • [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Michael Chapman 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 14:31:24 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Kai Schaetzl 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:22:46 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! John D. Hardin 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:43:15 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:30:48 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:07:09 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 11:15:38 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin dkim and domain keys checks Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 13:03:45 EDT
  • spamassassin dkim and domain keys checks Christopher Nido 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 09:35:09 EDT
  • non-phish corpus? Justin Mason 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 09:34:27 EDT
  • RE: Why'd VBounce not hit? Dan Barker 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 09:01:22 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles maillist 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 08:40:22 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles maillist 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 08:29:04 EDT
  • RE: spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles Jason Bertoch 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 06:22:20 EDT
  • spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles Lanfranco Fabriani 
• Thu Aug 23 2007 - 02:31:13 EDT
  • Re: spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Per Jessen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 17:52:00 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 16:26:32 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! maillist 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 16:25:25 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:54:58 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Rick Macdougall 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:39:28 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jon Trulson 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:37:11 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jon Trulson 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:33:18 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:26:24 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:17:27 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:06:47 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:55:18 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:48:44 EDT
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Jari Fredriksson 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:35:28 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:29:38 EDT
  • is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:29:27 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:05:08 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Aaron Wolfe 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:03:32 EDT
  • RDNS_DYNAMIC doesn't detect some hostnames Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 13:05:09 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:58:31 EDT
  • RE: White list based on host Received From Bowie Bailey 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:46:37 EDT
  • White list based on host Received From Dean Clapper 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:26:35 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Noel Jones 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:20:23 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Kai Schaetzl 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:04:27 EDT
  • Re: spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Justin Mason 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 11:56:24 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 11:50:08 EDT
  • Re: spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Per Jessen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 11:33:17 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Kevin Parris 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:49:04 EDT
  • Re: plugin won't load Mark Wendt (Contractor) 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:49:05 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:48:33 EDT
  • RE: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Bowie Bailey 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:43:19 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:35:55 EDT
  • Re: plugin won't load Duane Hill 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:33:36 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Kai Schaetzl 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:21:36 EDT
  • plugin won't load Mark Wendt (Contractor) 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:53:32 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:01:09 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:34:16 EDT
  • Re: dropping spam John D. Hardin 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:47:26 EDT
  • RE: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Bowie Bailey 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:37:01 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Ben O'Hara 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:27:41 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:21:42 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:19:15 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:18:44 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:07:33 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Pawel Sasin 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:56:08 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:39:10 EDT
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:25:54 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Justin Mason 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:21:02 EDT
  • Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:10:58 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 07:53:58 EDT
  • Re: ham mail marked as spam Matt Kettler 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 07:11:01 EDT
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Loren Wilton 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 07:03:40 EDT
  • dropping spamHi Euroka 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 05:41:53 EDT
  • Re: Adding new header to SA Steve Freegard 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 05:37:42 EDT
  • Re: ham mail marked as spam Raymond Dijkxhoorn 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 05:25:16 EDT
  • Re: ham mail marked as spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 03:58:30 EDT
  • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Martin.Hepworth 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 03:20:23 EDT
  • Re: Adding new header to SA yossim 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 02:41:59 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today René Berber 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 02:17:56 EDT
  • ham mail marked as spam Sg 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 00:50:48 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 00:45:03 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores John Rudd 
• Wed Aug 22 2007 - 00:00:52 EDT
  • Re: Rule for this kind of spam? John Andersen 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 23:14:27 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Duane Hill 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 22:54:01 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Matt Kettler 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:59:31 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Skip Brott 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:52:40 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Michael Alan Dorman 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:52:04 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Daniel Aquino 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:51:31 EDT
  • Fwd: Bouncing emails from certain countries Daniel Aquino 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 20:58:33 EDT
  • RE: Blacklist problems! Skip Brott 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 20:45:33 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jo Rhett 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 20:43:26 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jo Rhett 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 19:31:15 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:54:14 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today René Berber 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:46:35 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:42:42 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:34:13 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today SM 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:35:51 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:24:23 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:22:20 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:04:39 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:56:27 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Andy Sutton 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:48:31 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Matthias Leisi 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:40:34 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:34:38 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Steven Kurylo 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:31:19 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Kai Schaetzl 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:23:56 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Bill Landry 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:08:06 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:03:30 EDT
  • Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:59:59 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:54:58 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! maillist 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:50:28 EDT
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:45:42 EDT
  • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today SM 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:42:40 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:42:24 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Marc Perkel 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:40:51 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Kai Schaetzl 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:30:04 EDT
  • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Andy Sutton 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:29:46 EDT
  • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:20:17 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today SM 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:08:06 EDT
  • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 15:36:26 EDT
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 15:15:27 EDT
  • BOTNET Exceptions for Today Bret Miller 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 15:10:08 EDT
  • Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 14:48:05 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Duane Hill 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 14:31:41 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jo Rhett 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 14:17:07 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Duane Hill 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 14:13:48 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Jo Rhett 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 14:03:57 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jo Rhett 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 12:23:30 EDT
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 11:49:51 EDT
  • Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:56:05 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:54:47 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 11:28:31 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Duane Hill 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:44:46 EDT
  • spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Per Jessen 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:35:18 EDT
  • Re: PDFInfo version 0.8? Big Wave Dave 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:33:29 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Matt 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:14:22 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Andy Sutton 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:00:01 EDT
  • RE: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org Bowie Bailey 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:47:45 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Skip Brott 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:47:17 EDT
  • Re: Adding new header to SA Matt Kettler 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:42:10 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:37:50 EDT
  • Re: adjusting DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN scores Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:24:09 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 08:39:49 EDT
  • Re: Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 08:31:43 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 08:28:51 EDT
  • Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems dougp23 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 07:20:05 EDT
  • RE: Suggested botnet rule scores tkb2766 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:12:37 EDT
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Tim A 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 07:31:33 EDT
  • Re: Adding new header to SA Steve Freegard 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 04:31:20 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 04:27:11 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 04:26:18 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 04:25:01 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 03:57:25 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris 
• Tue Aug 21 2007 - 03:24:18 EDT
  • Re: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 22:36:51 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores John Thompson 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 22:11:31 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Chris 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 21:37:46 EDT
  • Re: Adding new header to SA Matt Kettler 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 20:48:37 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jo Rhett 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 20:08:38 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? David B Funk 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 19:07:48 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Duane Hill 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 18:24:50 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jon Trulson 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 18:05:08 EDT
  • Re: blank mail with pdf attachment slipping right through Jari Fredriksson 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:53:13 EDT
  • Re: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org David B Funk 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:41:46 EDT
  • Another humorous one. jdow 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:31:18 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:31:00 EDT
  • blank mail with pdf attachment slipping right through Jonathan Nichols 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:26:52 EDT
  • Re: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org Theo Van Dinter 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:14:30 EDT
  • sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 15:08:26 EDT
  • Re: Rule for this kind of spam? John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 14:35:19 EDT
  • RE: Why'd VBounce not hit? Dan Barker 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 14:34:07 EDT
  • UnixNFSSafe.pm uninitialized value at subtraction ? Daniel Aquino 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 14:06:58 EDT
  • Re: picture spams Loren Wilton 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:32:24 EDT
  • Re: Why'd VBounce not hit? Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:00:47 EDT
  • Re: False positives John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:13:54 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:18:10 EDT
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:27:12 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:20:00 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Why'd VBounce not hit? Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:05:49 EDT
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Kelson 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 12:21:00 EDT
  • Re: Is this a crazy idea? Double scoring.. Tuc at T-B-O-H 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 12:07:30 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 12:04:58 EDT
  • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:54:38 EDT
  • Re: False positives FaberK 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:07:41 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Dave Pooser 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:42:37 EDT
  • Re: False positives SM 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:40:28 EDT
  • RE: Adding new header to SA Martin.Hepworth 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:37:40 EDT
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Bob McClure Jr 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:30:38 EDT
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Jared Hall 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:16:00 EDT
  • Re: Use of uninitialized value in hash element at Received.pm line 357 gb.lists.07 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:04:56 EDT
  • Re: Addendum -- New spamassassin significant install problems James Lay 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:55:07 EDT
  • Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Patman 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:48:01 EDT
  • Adding new header to SA yossim 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:45:32 EDT
  • Re: picture spams Pawe³ Têcza 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:42:13 EDT
  • Re: picture spams Pawe³ Têcza 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:34:34 EDT
  • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? snowcrash+sa 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:31:49 EDT
  • Re: Mail server hosted by Comcast Matt 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:29:13 EDT
  • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:23:36 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:20:42 EDT
  • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? snowcrash+sa 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:17:15 EDT
  • SpamAssassin port Mário Gamito 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:14:11 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:09:06 EDT
  • Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:54:05 EDT
  • PDFInfo version 0.8? Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:48:14 EDT
  • Re: False positives FaberK 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:31:47 EDT
  • Re: spamd: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) John D. Hardin 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:35:39 EDT
  • Re: Why'd VBounce not hit? Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:32:50 EDT
  • Re: False positives FaberK 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:33:23 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:14:47 EDT
  • Re: Rules for dealing with.. [Fwd: massage therapists mailing list] Per Jessen 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:05:44 EDT
  • RE: Why'd VBounce not hit? Dan Barker 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:12:59 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 08:30:21 EDT
  • Re: Headers: What do I block here? dougp23 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:56:20 EDT
  • Re: False positives Jari Fredriksson 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:23:49 EDT
  • R: False positives Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:23:15 EDT
  • Re: False positives Martin Schütte 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:15:58 EDT
  • False positives FaberK 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 06:42:36 EDT
  • R: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 06:31:18 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 06:17:50 EDT
  • Re: spamd: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 06:16:31 EDT
  • Re: Why'd VBounce not hit? Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: False Positive on FORGED_AOL_TAGS Kai Schaetzl 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 05:54:20 EDT
  • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Matthias Haegele 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 05:12:05 EDT
  • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? Justin Mason 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 04:58:11 EDT
  • Rules for dealing with.. [Fwd: massage therapists mailing list] Jesper MÃ¥rtenson 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 04:39:13 EDT
  • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Martin.Hepworth 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 01:05:50 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 00:22:21 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Phil Barnett 
• Mon Aug 20 2007 - 00:07:16 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:58:44 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? SM 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:54:19 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:52:40 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:49:16 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:16:24 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? brian 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:16:45 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:08:21 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 22:37:41 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 22:16:33 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:52:48 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:39:39 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Dave Pooser 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:26:23 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:22:16 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:05:59 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Dave Pooser 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:00:12 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:45:17 EDT
  • Re: Confused beyond belief ... Loren Wilton 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:36:30 EDT
  • Confused beyond belief ... Michael Chapman 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:07:30 EDT
  • RE: Why'd VBounce not hit? Dan Barker 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:37:22 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? John Thompson 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:05:01 EDT
  • Is this a crazy idea? Double scoring.. Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:34:28 EDT
  • RE: Upgrading from 3.1.4 to 3.2.3 Skip Brott 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:28:58 EDT
  • is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? snowcrash+sa 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:02:59 EDT
  • Re: Headers: What do I block here? Matt Kettler 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:02:53 EDT
  • False Positive on FORGED_AOL_TAGS Marc Perkel 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 18:56:05 EDT
  • Upgrading from 3.1.4 to 3.2.3 Netdynamix 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 16:30:59 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores John Thompson 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 14:11:15 EDT
  • Headers: What do I block here? dougp23 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 13:31:22 EDT
  • Re: Why'd VBounce not hit? Kai Schaetzl 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 11:19:26 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 11:16:07 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 10:41:20 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? James Lay 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 10:14:52 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 10:29:07 EDT
  • Re: Famous spamfighter offline?iecc.com? SM 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 10:22:45 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Marc Perkel 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 09:22:44 EDT
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 08:58:22 EDT
  • RE: Why'd VBounce not hit? Dan Barker 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 08:12:05 EDT
  • Re: Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Matt Kettler 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 07:56:48 EDT
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Matt Kettler 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 07:22:20 EDT
  • Re: Famous spamfighter offline?iecc.com? Kai Schaetzl 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 06:45:32 EDT
  • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Robert - elists 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 06:31:18 EDT
  • Re: DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 not allowing for TZ diff Kai Schaetzl 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 06:23:34 EDT
  • Famous spamfighter offline?iecc.com? Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 05:18:42 EDT
  • adjusting DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN scores Leon Kolchinsky 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 04:45:32 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 04:42:35 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 02:08:09 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Jo Rhett 
• Sun Aug 19 2007 - 02:04:07 EDT
  • Re: PDF rule not matching -- split line content type? Jo Rhett 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 23:24:44 EDT
  • How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 22:49:03 EDT
  • Re: Rule for PDF and eCard Spam Needed Bill Randle 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 22:26:57 EDT
  • Re: Rule for PDF and eCard Spam Needed Jo Rhett 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 21:28:27 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Jared Hall 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 20:41:18 EDT
  • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Robert - elists 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 20:24:22 EDT
  • DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 not allowing for TZ diff net-buoy 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 20:09:23 EDT
  • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 18:21:24 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores René Berber 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 18:19:31 EDT
  • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Robert - elists 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 17:31:17 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Kai Schaetzl 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 16:24:15 EDT
  • Re: Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Aaron Wolfe 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 15:46:34 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 15:27:34 EDT
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 15:04:13 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 14:41:04 EDT
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Chip M. 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 14:31:32 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Kai Schaetzl 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 13:38:20 EDT
  • Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Marc Perkel 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 13:30:45 EDT
  • Re: Question - How many of you run ALL your email through SA? Marc Perkel 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 13:27:16 EDT
  • spamd: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) Marc Perkel 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 12:47:04 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Jerry Durand 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 12:45:08 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 12:43:55 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 12:35:20 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:10:05 EDT
  • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Scott Larsen 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 11:11:22 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Robert Fitzpatrick 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 11:07:54 EDT
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs SM 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 10:24:39 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Magnus Holmgren 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 10:17:00 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 10:14:53 EDT
  • Re: Suggested botnet rule scores Nix 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 06:33:49 EDT
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs aag_uk 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 06:31:36 EDT
  • Re: Spamassassin with xmail and custom filter Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: prerequisites for SA according to Makefile.PL Kai Schaetzl 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 05:31:17 EDT
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Kai Schaetzl 
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Kai Schaetzl 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:59:15 EDT
  • Re: Query about DNS_FROM_DOB Jeff Chan 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:48:31 EDT
  • Re: how to short circuit def_whitelist_from_spf rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:46:16 EDT
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea&n