Mailing List Archive For users@apache.org Aug 2007 By Thread

• header /^\Q...\E$/m jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 23:06:24 EDT)
• Parsing Received Headers Bret Miller (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:50:15 EDT)
• FuzzyOcr misses John Thompson (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:32:58 EDT)
  • Re: FuzzyOcr misses John Thompson (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 21:41:28 EDT)
• Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822 Tony Le Piane (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 10:54:22 EDT)
  • RE: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822 Dan Barker (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 11:20:33 EDT)
    • RE: Invalid Date header - Date not RFC 2822 Per Jessen (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 15:35:29 EDT)
• Support - spamassassin Tony Le Piane (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 10:38:14 EDT)
  • Re: Support - spamassassin Duane Hill (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 11:07:08 EDT)
    • RE: Support - spamassassin Tony Le Piane (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 11:15:59 EDT)
      • RE: Support - spamassassin SM (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 12:06:46 EDT)
• Hurting Bayes with "(spam)" in the subject line? Clay Davis (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 11:44:24 EDT)
  • Re: Hurting Bayes with "(spam)" in the subject line? Micha³ Jêczalik (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 12:35:14 EDT)
• Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Igor Chudov (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 10:59:34 EDT)
  • R: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Giampaolo Tomassoni (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 12:07:45 EDT)
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Tejas Jin (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 13:42:09 EDT)
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Jeff Eshom (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 16:58:14 EDT)
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Kai Schaetzl (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:31:29 EDT)
    • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Jerry Durand (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:37:12 EDT)
      • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Loren Wilton (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 18:59:27 EDT)
      • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? John Rudd (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 19:14:25 EDT)
      • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? Loren Wilton (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 19:52:21 EDT)
  • Re: Do procmail and spamassassin violate this "patent"? maillist (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 20:11:23 EDT)
• Dkfiltrt + Postfix + SPamassassin Thiva Charanasri (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:42:34 EDT)
  • Re: Dkfiltrt + Postfix + SPamassassin SM (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:35:00 EDT)
• FuzzyOcr and spamassassin 3.2.x Paolo De Marco (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:31:42 EDT)
• Usage of journal in Bayesian Filtering. Srilatha (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 03:55:12 EDT)
  • Re: Usage of journal in Bayesian Filtering. Matt Kettler (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:43:27 EDT)
• Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses Dan Fulbright (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 00:16:27 EDT)
  • Re: Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses Loren Wilton (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 00:31:33 EDT)
    • Re: Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses John D. Hardin (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:25:46 EDT)
• spamd keeps haning on win32 MacDonald, Mike (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:46:18 EDT)
  • Re: spamd keeps haning on win32 Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 20:01:31 EDT)
  • Re: spamd keeps haning on win32 Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:24:10 EDT)
• SARE fraud ruleset rotted? John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 16:25:49 EDT)
  • Re: SARE fraud ruleset rotted? Doc Schneider (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 17:22:05 EDT)
    • Re: SARE fraud ruleset rotted? John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 17:43:40 EDT)
• spam reports Michael Grant (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:00:34 EDT)
  • Re: spam reports Jari Fredriksson (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 15:16:37 EDT)
    • Re: spam reports Michael Grant (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 15:19:02 EDT)
• white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:39:00 EDT)
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Bowie Bailey (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:55:24 EDT)
    • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:03:37 EDT)
      • Re: white_list is not working.....HELP! Matt Kettler (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 22:10:27 EDT)
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Bowie Bailey (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:27:48 EDT)
    • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 11:32:00 EDT)
      • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! SM (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:58:53 EDT)
  • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Bowie Bailey (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:11:06 EDT)
    • RE: white_list is not working.....HELP! Tony Guadagno (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:17:14 EDT)
• SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building FH (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:29:13 EDT)
  • Re: SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building FH (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:21:41 EDT)
    • Re: SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building Jerry Durand (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:29:09 EDT)
    • Re: SA locked up and seemingly dumped the DB we've been building Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 17:30:24 EDT)
• Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused Simon (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 22:29:56 EDT)
  • Re: Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused Mark Martinec (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:44:37 EDT)
    • Re: Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused Simon (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 17:25:44 EDT)
      • Re: Occasional spamassassin: Connection refused mouss (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 18:11:56 EDT)
• chickenpox.cf ham Robert Fitzpatrick (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:10:01 EDT)
  • Re: chickenpox.cf ham Loren Wilton (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:23:45 EDT)
    • Re: chickenpox.cf ham Matthew Newton (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 08:08:17 EDT)
• OT blacklist check Jean-Paul Natola (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:07:15 EDT)
  • RE: OT blacklist check Dan Barker (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:10:20 EDT)
    • RE: OT blacklist check Jerry Durand (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:17:19 EDT)
  • Re: OT blacklist check Luis Hernán Otegui (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:47:05 EDT)
    • RE: OT blacklist check Jean-Paul Natola (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:31:44 EDT)
      • Re: OT blacklist check Bob McClure Jr (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:43:28 EDT)
      • Re: OT blacklist check Bob Proulx (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 20:04:41 EDT)
• two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:02:05 EDT)
  • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Loren Wilton (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:16:35 EDT)
    • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:12:48 EDT)
      • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:20:00 EDT)
      • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:41:37 EDT)
      • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Andy Dills (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 21:59:35 EDT)
      • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? snowcrash+sa (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 22:09:02 EDT)
      • R: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:43:53 EDT)
      • RE: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Dan Barker (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 07:48:10 EDT)
      • R: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 08:44:56 EDT)
      • Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Mark Martinec (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:28:26 EDT)
      • R: Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 19:47:50 EDT)
      • R: Re: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 19:53:20 EDT)
  • R: two supposedly identical SA boxes, with slightly different report output -- help find the diff? Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:24:23 EDT)
• And interesting way to detect spambots Marc Perkel (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:53:28 EDT)
  • Re: And interesting way to detect spambots Marc Perkel (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:01:52 EDT)
  • Re: And interesting way to detect spambots Justin Mason (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:11:26 EDT)
    • R: And interesting way to detect spambots Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:24:59 EDT)
      • Re: R: And interesting way to detect spambots John D. Hardin (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:36:14 EDT)
      • Re: R: And interesting way to detect spambots Jim Maul (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:40:21 EDT)
  • RE: And interesting way to detect spambots Thomas Raef (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:12:55 EDT)
• Storm worm redux Rick Zeman (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:24:01 EDT)
• SA Updating Rense Buijen (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:01:09 EDT)
  • RE: SA Updating Bret Miller (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:10:23 EDT)
• YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:49:44 EDT)
  • RE: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Bret Miller (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:07:40 EDT)
    • R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:16:23 EDT)
      • Re: R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea mouss (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:32:28 EDT)
      • Re: R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Theo Van Dinter (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:41:16 EDT)
      • R: R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 14:58:02 EDT)
  • Re: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Theo Van Dinter (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:49:10 EDT)
    • R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea Giampaolo Tomassoni (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:05:24 EDT)
  • Re: Yet Another Great Idea Loren Wilton (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 12:35:02 EDT)
  • R: YAGI: Yet Another Great Idea - Some findings Giampaolo Tomassoni (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:06:27 EDT)
• spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 07:09:55 EDT)
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:15:00 EDT)
    • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Mark Martinec (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:18:24 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:25:58 EDT)
      • integration with domino....linux richard venne (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 09:32:07 EDT)
      • Re: integration with domino....linux Matthias Leisi (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 15:46:56 EDT)
      • Re: integration with domino....linux richard venne (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:54:50 EDT)
      • Re: Re: integration with domino....linux vitas1(at)itera.ru (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:59:51 EDT)
      • RE: integration with domino....linux Martin.Hepworth (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 17:18:20 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:35:45 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Michael Parker (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:59:21 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:09:14 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Zbigniew Szalbot (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:14:42 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:19:36 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:39:49 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Anthony Peacock (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 11:55:50 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:29:04 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Anthony Peacock (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 04:46:00 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 05:55:14 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:05:11 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 12:17:09 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 04:10:46 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 04:12:39 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 05:36:28 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:37:55 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 21:13:02 EDT)
      • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process John D. Hardin (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 13:18:54 EDT)
    • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Micke Andersson (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 09:55:08 EDT)
      • spamd and plugins jonathan (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 11:17:30 EDT)
      • Re: spamd and plugins Matthias Leisi (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 13:47:01 EDT)
      • Re: spamd and plugins jonathan (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 14:09:07 EDT)
      • Re: spamd and plugins Matthias Leisi (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 14:27:54 EDT)
      • Re: spamd and plugins jonathan (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 14:12:36 EDT)
• InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Pawe³ Têcza (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 06:16:22 EDT)
  • Re: InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Alex Woick (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 10:57:52 EDT)
    • Re: InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Pawe³ Têcza (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 03:47:52 EDT)
      • Re: InnoDB as storage engine for sa_bayes Pawe³ Têcza (Thu Aug 30 2007 - 04:14:57 EDT)
• completewhois.com Giampaolo Tomassoni (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: completewhois.com Loren Wilton (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: completewhois.com Justin Mason (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:39:28 EDT)
    • Re: completewhois.com Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:20:13 EDT)
  • R: completewhois.com Giampaolo Tomassoni (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:40:02 EDT)
    • Re: R: completewhois.com Kelson (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:46:12 EDT)
      • R: R: completewhois.com Giampaolo Tomassoni (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:53:24 EDT)
  • Re: completewhois.com Per Jessen (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 02:39:55 EDT)
• Whitelisting IP's Matt (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:24:05 EDT)
  • Re: Whitelisting IP's John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:55:23 EDT)
• where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:05:54 EDT)
  • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? Justin Mason (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:11:20 EDT)
    • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:22:41 EDT)
      • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? Theo Van Dinter (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:31:20 EDT)
      • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:10:26 EDT)
      • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? Justin Mason (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:42:12 EDT)
      • Re: where'd SendmailID.pm go? snowcrash+sa (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:59:09 EDT)
• Some thoughts on Baysian Setup... OliverScott (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:09:17 EDT)
  • Re: Some thoughts on Baysian Setup... Chris St. Pierre (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:46:51 EDT)
    • Re: Some thoughts on Baysian Setup... Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Fri Aug 31 2007 - 10:59:29 EDT)
• False negative FaberK (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:38:00 EDT)
  • Re: False negative OliverScott (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:19:08 EDT)
• FuzzyOCR miss John Thompson (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 16:09:06 EDT)
• SPF-Compliant Spam Jason Bertoch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 08:59:18 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Edward Francis Klimowicz (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:14:58 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:26:49 EDT)
    • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Justin Mason (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:35:39 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:52:28 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Matt Kettler (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:09:56 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:02:21 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Per Jessen (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:56:48 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:49:12 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kelson (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:57:14 EDT)
      • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Rick Cooper (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:42:17 EDT)
    • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Matt Kettler (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:05:01 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Per Jessen (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:55:16 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam j o a r (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:37:41 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:20:13 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam j o a r (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:04:31 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bill Landry (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:28:09 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:32:13 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam mouss (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:11:42 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:09:12 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:50:45 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:00:37 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:26:12 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:47:37 EDT)
      • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Rick Cooper (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:45:59 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 08:39:59 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Matt Kettler (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 19:46:11 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 20:56:04 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam David B Funk (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 01:52:29 EDT)
    • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:17:16 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:54:05 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:52:48 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Per Jessen (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 04:33:37 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Graham Murray (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 02:32:21 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Magnus Holmgren (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:27:22 EDT)
    • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Jason Bertoch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:47:41 EDT)
      • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:35:02 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 10:48:06 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam mouss (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:52:04 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Graham Murray (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:11:48 EDT)
  • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Kelson (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:39:06 EDT)
    • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Meng Weng Wong (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 16:24:19 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:29:00 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Luis Hernán Otegui (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:49:23 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:56:41 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Luis Hernán Otegui (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:03:00 EDT)
      • RE: SPF-Compliant Spam Rick Cooper (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:48:35 EDT)
      • END OF THREAD (was Re: SPF-Compliant Spam) Justin Mason (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 05:42:02 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:58:43 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Luis Hernán Otegui (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:09:53 EDT)
      • Re: SPF-Compliant Spam Bernd Petrovitsch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:39:33 EDT)
• using --max-conn-per-child=1 Dan Massey (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 07:47:23 EDT)
• Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... John Fleming (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 20:44:38 EDT)
  • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... Justin Mason (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:26:21 EDT)
    • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 05:28:59 EDT)
      • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... John Fleming (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 17:00:25 EDT)
  • Re: Can't resolve domain to addresses at /usr... Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:31:21 EDT)
• How to query the AWL at an earlier stage for Short Circuit? OliverScott (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 19:35:30 EDT)
  • Re: How to query the AWL at an earlier stage for Short Circuit? Matt Kettler (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 21:39:17 EDT)
• Bayes DB file locations help got2go (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 03:26:39 EDT)
  • Re: Bayes DB file locations help Matt Kettler (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 08:10:17 EDT)
• HELO dns resolution Nikolay Shopik (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:00:31 EDT)
  • Re: HELO dns resolution Matt Kettler (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 20:45:34 EDT)
• recieving spam from my own domain? Linooks (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:56:54 EDT)
  • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Jari Fredriksson (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 15:11:13 EDT)
    • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Linooks (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 15:43:17 EDT)
      • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Theo Van Dinter (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:00:30 EDT)
      • Re: recieving spam from my own domain? Linooks (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:16:21 EDT)
• spamd children killed but don't die? Rosenbaum, Larry M. (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:55:27 EDT)
• Ipower Webhostig with Spamassasin Kracht, Tim (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 11:05:33 EDT)
• Ipower webhosting spamassasin itguy (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 09:39:55 EDT)
• How to stop these? Robert Fitzpatrick (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 09:09:43 EDT)
  • Re: How to stop these? John D. Hardin (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 09:48:25 EDT)
    • Re: How to stop these? Robert Fitzpatrick (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:28:58 EDT)
      • Re: How to stop these? bgodette(at)idcomm.com (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 20:52:49 EDT)
  • Re: How to stop these? Robert Fitzpatrick (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:27:09 EDT)
    • Re: How to stop these? Loren Wilton (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:36:10 EDT)
    • Re: How to stop these? Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 11:31:15 EDT)
  • Re: How to stop these? Rick Zeman (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:55:00 EDT)
    • Re: How to stop these? mouss (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 10:04:09 EDT)
  • Re: How to stop these? Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 11:31:15 EDT)
• Combine whitelist_to and whitelist_from users-spamassassin(at)eurower.com (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 07:46:10 EDT)
  • Re: Combine whitelist_to and whitelist_from Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:07:47 EDT)
  • Re: Combine whitelist_to and whitelist_from users-spamassassin(at)eurower.com (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:46:22 EDT)
• report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 07:44:00 EDT)
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:47:03 EDT)
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:53:19 EDT)
    • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 10:39:41 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 20:38:13 EDT)
  • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 04:07:29 EDT)
    • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 23:13:47 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 14:02:53 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Loren Wilton (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:18:46 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 01:24:46 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Loren Wilton (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:37:18 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:30:59 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Loren Wilton (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 16:50:26 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Matt Kettler (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 00:32:23 EDT)
      • Re: report_header and use_terse_report errors Zbigniew Szalbot (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 01:51:54 EDT)
• charter.net Jonn R Taylor (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 21:59:50 EDT)
  • Re: charter.net Matt Kettler (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:34:29 EDT)
    • Re: charter.net Jonn R Taylor (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:42:59 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net Matt Kettler (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:59:11 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net Kai Schaetzl (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 06:31:34 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net Jonn R Taylor (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 08:30:22 EDT)
      • RE: charter.net Ray Dzek (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:57:23 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net maillist (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 21:00:26 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net Matt Kettler (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 23:34:20 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net Kai Schaetzl (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 19:31:20 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net Tom Ray (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 12:39:20 EDT)
      • Re: charter.net SM (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 23:39:31 EDT)
  • Re: charter.net Jonn R Taylor (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 23:15:29 EDT)
• [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Michael Chapman (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 16:32:58 EDT)
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Dan Barker (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:16:18 EDT)
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Jari Fredriksson (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:30:09 EDT)
      • Re: [Fwd: Blacklist problems!] Kai Schaetzl (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 18:31:19 EDT)
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:31:42 EDT)
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Theo Van Dinter (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:32:25 EDT)
      • RE: [Fwd: Re: Blacklist problems!] Dan Barker (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 17:40:29 EDT)
• spamassassin dkim and domain keys checks Christopher Nido (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 13:03:45 EDT)
  • Re: spamassassin dkim and domain keys checks Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 11:15:38 EDT)
• non-phish corpus? Justin Mason (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 09:35:09 EDT)
  • Re: non-phish corpus? hamann.w(at)t-online.de (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 12:35:50 EDT)
• spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles Lanfranco Fabriani (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 06:22:20 EDT)
  • RE: spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles Jason Bertoch (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 08:29:04 EDT)
  • Re: spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles maillist (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 08:40:22 EDT)
  • Re: spamassassin 3.2.3 tempfiles maillist (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 09:01:22 EDT)
• is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:29:38 EDT)
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Jari Fredriksson (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:48:44 EDT)
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:55:18 EDT)
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Ralf Hildebrandt (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:06:47 EDT)
    • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:17:27 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:26:24 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:33:18 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Rick Macdougall (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 15:54:58 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 16:25:25 EDT)
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Matt Kettler (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 22:35:46 EDT)
    • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:53:32 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:05:27 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:12:28 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:50:40 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Tom Ray (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 14:55:34 EDT)
      • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Matt Kettler (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 20:47:06 EDT)
  • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? John D. Hardin (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:02:22 EDT)
    • Re: is it possible to setup SA in a different machine? Linooks (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:14:24 EDT)
• RDNS_DYNAMIC doesn't detect some hostnames Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:03:32 EDT)
• White list based on host Received From Dean Clapper (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:46:37 EDT)
  • RE: White list based on host Received From Bowie Bailey (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:58:31 EDT)
• plugin won't load Mark Wendt (Contractor) (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:21:36 EDT)
  • Re: plugin won't load Duane Hill (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:35:55 EDT)
    • Re: plugin won't load Mark Wendt (Contractor) (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:49:04 EDT)
• Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:21:02 EDT)
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Matthias Leisi (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:39:10 EDT)
    • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:56:08 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Pawel Sasin (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:07:33 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:21:42 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Matthias Leisi (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:19:15 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:27:41 EDT)
    • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:18:44 EDT)
  • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Ben O'Hara (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:37:01 EDT)
  • RE: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Bowie Bailey (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:47:26 EDT)
    • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:01:09 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Kai Schaetzl (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:33:36 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Rense Buijen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:43:19 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Kai Schaetzl (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:20:23 EDT)
      • Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 10:51:07 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 14:02:11 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 15:51:47 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] John Rudd (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:08:27 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Duane Hill (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:34:02 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] John Rudd (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:42:25 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Duane Hill (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:29:50 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 05:31:15 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 08:49:30 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kenneth Porter (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:39:44 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:31:20 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 20:31:26 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kenneth Porter (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 23:47:18 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] David B Funk (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 23:46:50 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 09:19:21 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Steven Kurylo (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 12:34:13 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] David B Funk (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:29:45 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:59:42 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] David B Funk (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:35:13 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Andy Sutton (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:39:57 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:46:52 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Aaron Wolfe (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 01:58:05 EDT)
      • Whitelist for misconfigured mail servers (was: Posioned MX is a bad idea) Kenneth Porter (Wed Aug 29 2007 - 14:21:24 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:53:34 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] DAve (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 01:05:05 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 17:56:52 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Dave Pooser (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:14:04 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Tony Finch (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:18:33 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Dave Pooser (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 10:48:00 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Tony Finch (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 06:04:40 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Rob McEwen (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:21:16 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 18:33:46 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea John D. Hardin (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 19:58:44 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Rob McEwen (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 20:57:59 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Nikolay Shopik (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 04:34:24 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea John D. Hardin (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:36:14 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Nikolay Shopik (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:50:18 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea Nikolay Shopik (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 16:29:14 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:31:20 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 08:29:28 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Nikolay Shopik (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 17:21:37 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] John Rudd (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 17:41:58 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Marc Perkel (Sat Aug 25 2007 - 16:51:43 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:31:20 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea - Challenge Marc Perkel (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 20:36:55 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea - Challenge Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:31:21 EDT)
      • RE: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Michael Scheidell (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 09:54:16 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Kai Schaetzl (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 12:31:21 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] mouss (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 13:30:59 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] martin f krafft (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 06:19:49 EDT)
      • Re: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Dave Mifsud (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 08:08:34 EDT)
      • RE: Posioned MX is a bad idea [Was: Email forwarding and RBL trouble] Michael Scheidell (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 13:21:46 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:35:28 EDT)
      • Re: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Aaron Wolfe (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 14:05:08 EDT)
  • RE: Email forwarding and RBL trouble Bowie Bailey (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:48:33 EDT)
• dropping spamHi Euroka (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 07:03:40 EDT)
  • Re: dropping spam John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:34:16 EDT)
• ham mail marked as spam Sg (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 02:17:56 EDT)
  • Re: ham mail marked as spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 05:25:16 EDT)
    • Re: ham mail marked as spam Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 05:37:42 EDT)
  • Re: ham mail marked as spam Matt Kettler (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 07:53:58 EDT)
• Fwd: Bouncing emails from certain countries Daniel Aquino (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:51:31 EDT)
• Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:03:30 EDT)
  • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Loren Wilton (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 07:11:01 EDT)
  • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:09:15 EDT)
    • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists John Rudd (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:25:12 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Loren Wilton (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:39:07 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists John Rudd (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:23:02 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:34:48 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists John Rudd (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:43:47 EDT)
    • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:30:16 EDT)
      • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:45:55 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 17:50:04 EDT)
      • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:31:12 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 18:39:27 EDT)
      • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:12:53 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Marc Perkel (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:15:09 EDT)
      • RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Bret Miller (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:24:58 EDT)
      • Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists Matt Kettler (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 10:31:18 EDT)
• BOTNET Exceptions for Today Bret Miller (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 15:15:27 EDT)
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 15:36:26 EDT)
    • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Bret Miller (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:08:06 EDT)
      • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Andy Sutton (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:30:04 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:42:40 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Andy Sutton (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:56:27 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Michael Alan Dorman (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:52:40 EDT)
      • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today SM (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:45:42 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:08:06 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Kai Schaetzl (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:31:19 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Steven Kurylo (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:34:38 EDT)
    • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today SM (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:20:17 EDT)
      • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Bret Miller (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:29:46 EDT)
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Kai Schaetzl (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:40:51 EDT)
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today SM (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:34:13 EDT)
  • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today René Berber (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:54:14 EDT)
    • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 00:50:48 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today René Berber (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 02:41:59 EDT)
      • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Martin.Hepworth (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 03:58:30 EDT)
      • RE: BOTNET Exceptions for Today Robert Fitzpatrick (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 10:28:07 EDT)
      • Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today John Rudd (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 10:56:07 EDT)
• Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 15:10:08 EDT)
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Kai Schaetzl (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:40:51 EDT)
• Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:50:28 EDT)
• Re: Blacklist problems! maillist (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:54:58 EDT)
  • RE: Blacklist problems! Skip Brott (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 20:58:33 EDT)
• Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 16:59:59 EDT)
  • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:40:34 EDT)
    • Re: Blacklist problems! Matthias Leisi (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 17:48:31 EDT)
    • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:04:39 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:35:51 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:42:42 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 18:46:35 EDT)
    • Re: Blacklist problems! maillist (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 16:26:32 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! John D. Hardin (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 17:52:00 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:07:09 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Gary V (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:30:48 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Michael Chapman (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:43:15 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! John D. Hardin (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 13:22:46 EDT)
      • Re: Blacklist problems! Kai Schaetzl (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 14:31:24 EDT)
• Re: Blacklist problems! Matt Kettler (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 22:54:01 EDT)
• Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 11:49:51 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Jari Fredriksson (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 12:23:30 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Jo Rhett (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 14:13:48 EDT)
    • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:10:58 EDT)
      • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Justin Mason (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 08:25:54 EDT)
      • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 10:49:05 EDT)
  • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Kevin Parris (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 11:33:17 EDT)
    • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 11:56:24 EDT)
      • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Kai Schaetzl (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:20:23 EDT)
      • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost Noel Jones (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:26:35 EDT)
      • Re: Scanning mailer-daemon bounces generated by localhost sacoo sacoo (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 13:05:09 EDT)
• spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Per Jessen (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:44:46 EDT)
  • Re: spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Per Jessen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 11:50:08 EDT)
    • Re: spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Justin Mason (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 12:04:27 EDT)
      • Re: spamd fails to restart on SIGHUP? Per Jessen (Thu Aug 23 2007 - 02:31:13 EDT)
• Another humorous one. jdow (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:41:46 EDT)
• blank mail with pdf attachment slipping right through Jonathan Nichols (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:31:00 EDT)
  • Re: blank mail with pdf attachment slipping right through Jari Fredriksson (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 18:05:08 EDT)
• sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:14:30 EDT)
  • Re: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org Theo Van Dinter (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:26:52 EDT)
  • Re: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org David B Funk (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:53:13 EDT)
    • Re: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 03:24:18 EDT)
      • reading this list via Gmane, no need for extra copy jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:33:30 EDT)
    • sa-update stuck in July jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:50:02 EDT)
      • Re: sa-update stuck in July Theo Van Dinter (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 18:43:59 EDT)
      • Re: sa-update stuck in July jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 18:58:23 EDT)
      • Re: sa-update stuck in July Theo Van Dinter (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 19:19:39 EDT)
      • Re: sa-update stuck in July jidanni (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 21:56:48 EDT)
      • Re: sa-update stuck in July Justin Mason (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 05:27:03 EDT)
      • Re: sa-update stuck in July Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 07:00:50 EDT)
  • RE: sa-update doesn't connect to updates.spamassassin.org Bowie Bailey (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:00:01 EDT)
• Re: Rule for this kind of spam? John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 15:08:26 EDT)
  • Re: Rule for this kind of spam? John Andersen (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 00:00:52 EDT)
• UnixNFSSafe.pm uninitialized value at subtraction ? Daniel Aquino (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 14:34:07 EDT)
• Re: Use of uninitialized value in hash element at Received.pm line 357 gb.lists.07 (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:16:00 EDT)
• Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Patman (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:55:07 EDT)
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Jared Hall (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:30:38 EDT)
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Bob McClure Jr (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:37:40 EDT)
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Kelson (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:05:49 EDT)
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:18:10 EDT)
  • Re: Using SpamAssassin to filter port 110 Tim A (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:12:37 EDT)
• Adding new header to SA yossim (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:48:01 EDT)
  • RE: Adding new header to SA Martin.Hepworth (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:40:28 EDT)
  • Re: Adding new header to SA Matt Kettler (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 21:37:46 EDT)
    • Re: Adding new header to SA Steve Freegard (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 07:31:33 EDT)
      • Re: Adding new header to SA Matt Kettler (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:47:17 EDT)
      • Re: Adding new header to SA yossim (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 03:20:23 EDT)
      • Re: Adding new header to SA Steve Freegard (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 05:41:53 EDT)
• SpamAssassin port Mário Gamito (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:17:15 EDT)
• PDFInfo version 0.8? Robert Fitzpatrick (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:54:05 EDT)
  • Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:09:06 EDT)
    • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Dave Pooser (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:07:41 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 12:04:58 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 12:07:30 EDT)
    • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:20:00 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:27:12 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 17:31:18 EDT)
    • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:13:54 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 03:57:25 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:24:09 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Chris (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:42:10 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Skip Brott (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:47:45 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:56:05 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Daniel Aquino (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:52:04 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries Skip Brott (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 21:59:31 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 17:51:57 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries jidanni(at)jidanni.org (Fri Aug 24 2007 - 16:54:17 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin (Sun Aug 26 2007 - 15:37:18 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Derek Harding (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 13:54:08 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 15:24:56 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries jidanni (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 21:04:28 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Justin Mason (Tue Aug 28 2007 - 05:22:43 EDT)
      • RE: Bouncing emails from certain countries John D. Hardin (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:54:47 EDT)
      • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries Andy Sutton (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:14:22 EDT)
    • Re: Bouncing emails from certain countries John Scully (Mon Aug 27 2007 - 14:11:43 EDT)
  • Re: PDFInfo version 0.8? Big Wave Dave (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 10:35:18 EDT)
• False positives FaberK (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:15:58 EDT)
  • Re: False positives Martin Schütte (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:23:15 EDT)
  • R: False positives Giampaolo Tomassoni (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:23:49 EDT)
  • Re: False positives Jari Fredriksson (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:56:20 EDT)
    • Re: False positives FaberK (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:32:50 EDT)
      • Re: False positives FaberK (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:48:14 EDT)
      • Re: False positives John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 13:00:47 EDT)
  • Re: False positives SM (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:42:37 EDT)
    • Re: False positives FaberK (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 11:54:38 EDT)
• Rules for dealing with.. [Fwd: massage therapists mailing list] Jesper MÃ¥rtenson (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 04:58:11 EDT)
  • Re: Rules for dealing with.. [Fwd: massage therapists mailing list] Per Jessen (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:14:47 EDT)
• Confused beyond belief ... Michael Chapman (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:36:30 EDT)
  • Re: Confused beyond belief ... Loren Wilton (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:45:17 EDT)
• Is this a crazy idea? Double scoring.. Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 20:05:01 EDT)
  • Re: Is this a crazy idea? Double scoring.. Tuc at T-B-O-H (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 12:21:00 EDT)
• is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? snowcrash+sa (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:28:58 EDT)
  • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? Justin Mason (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 05:12:05 EDT)
    • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? snowcrash+sa (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:20:42 EDT)
      • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? Justin Mason (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:29:13 EDT)
      • Re: is there any processor-dependency to sa-compile? snowcrash+sa (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:34:34 EDT)
• False Positive on FORGED_AOL_TAGS Marc Perkel (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:02:53 EDT)
  • Re: False Positive on FORGED_AOL_TAGS Kai Schaetzl (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 06:16:31 EDT)
• Upgrading from 3.1.4 to 3.2.3 Netdynamix (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 18:56:05 EDT)
  • RE: Upgrading from 3.1.4 to 3.2.3 Skip Brott (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:34:28 EDT)
• Headers: What do I block here? dougp23 (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 14:11:15 EDT)
  • Re: Headers: What do I block here? Matt Kettler (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:02:59 EDT)
    • Re: Headers: What do I block here? dougp23 (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 08:30:21 EDT)
• Famous spamfighter offline?iecc.com? Michael Scheidell (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 06:23:34 EDT)
  • Re: Famous spamfighter offline?iecc.com? Kai Schaetzl (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 07:22:20 EDT)
  • Re: Famous spamfighter offline?iecc.com? SM (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 10:29:07 EDT)
• adjusting DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN scores Leon Kolchinsky (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 05:18:42 EDT)
  • Re: adjusting DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS and DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN scores Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 09:37:50 EDT)
• How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 23:24:44 EDT)
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Matt Kettler (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 07:56:48 EDT)
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Michael Scheidell (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 09:22:44 EDT)
    • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 10:14:52 EDT)
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 11:16:07 EDT)
  • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 11:19:26 EDT)
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? John Thompson (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 19:37:22 EDT)
    • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:00:12 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Dave Pooser (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:05:59 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:22:16 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:52:40 EDT)
    • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:49:16 EDT)
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:26:23 EDT)
    • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Dave Pooser (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:39:39 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 21:52:48 EDT)
    • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 22:16:33 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 22:37:41 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:08:21 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:16:45 EDT)
      • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:12:59 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:54:19 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 00:07:16 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Robert - elists (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 01:05:50 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 07:33:23 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:14:11 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Gary V (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 10:23:36 EDT)
      • RE: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? peter(at)vfemail.net (Wed Aug 22 2007 - 09:53:32 EDT)
    • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? SM (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:58:44 EDT)
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? brian (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 23:16:24 EDT)
  • Re: How do I temporarily disable SpamAssassin? Phil Barnett (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 00:22:21 EDT)
• DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 not allowing for TZ diff net-buoy (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 20:24:22 EDT)
  • Re: DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 not allowing for TZ diff Kai Schaetzl (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 06:31:18 EDT)
• Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Marc Perkel (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 13:38:20 EDT)
  • Re: Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Aaron Wolfe (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 16:24:15 EDT)
    • Re: Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Matt Kettler (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 08:12:05 EDT)
  • Re: Conditionally bypassing RBL checks - how? Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Tue Aug 21 2007 - 08:39:49 EDT)
• spamd: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) Marc Perkel (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 13:27:16 EDT)
  • Re: spamd: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 06:17:50 EDT)
    • Re: spamd: bad protocol: header error: (closed before headers) John D. Hardin (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 09:31:47 EDT)
• v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 03:02:16 EDT)
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:46:16 EDT)
    • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 12:45:08 EDT)
  • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 05:31:17 EDT)
    • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 12:43:55 EDT)
      • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 14:31:32 EDT)
      • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 15:46:34 EDT)
      • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 17:31:17 EDT)
      • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Robert - elists (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 18:19:31 EDT)
      • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules MaraBlue (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 20:09:23 EDT)
      • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Robert - elists (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 20:41:18 EDT)
      • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Jared Hall (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 21:28:27 EDT)
      • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Martin.Hepworth (Mon Aug 20 2007 - 04:39:13 EDT)
      • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 04:45:32 EDT)
      • RE: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Robert - elists (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 06:45:32 EDT)
      • Re: v3.2.3 isn't recognizing local.cf custom rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Sun Aug 19 2007 - 04:42:35 EDT)
• how to short circuit def_whitelist_from_spf rules ram (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 02:58:38 EDT)
  • Re: how to short circuit def_whitelist_from_spf rules Daryl C. W. O'Shea (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:48:31 EDT)
• Query about DNS_FROM_DOB Jason Haar (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 02:50:10 EDT)
  • Re: Query about DNS_FROM_DOB Jeff Chan (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 03:40:54 EDT)
    • Re: Query about DNS_FROM_DOB Jason Haar (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:12:04 EDT)
      • Re: Query about DNS_FROM_DOB Jeff Chan (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 04:59:15 EDT)
• why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs aag_uk (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:39:48 EDT)
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Chris St. Pierre (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:58:37 EDT)
    • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs SM (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 17:19:06 EDT)
    • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs aag_uk (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 02:58:05 EDT)
      • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 05:31:17 EDT)
      • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs aag_uk (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 06:33:49 EDT)
      • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 14:31:32 EDT)
      • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs hamann.w(at)t-online.de (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 15:27:34 EDT)
      • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs SM (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 11:07:54 EDT)
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs John D. Hardin (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:58:02 EDT)
    • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs aag_uk (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 02:29:49 EDT)
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs hamann.w(at)t-online.de (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 00:38:02 EDT)
  • Re: why not doing a test that checks "name"-<email address> pairs Chip M. (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 14:41:04 EDT)
• why not checking "name" <email address pairs aag_uk (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:20:31 EDT)
• prerequisites for SA according to Makefile.PL Kai Schaetzl (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 15:31:20 EDT)
  • RE: prerequisites for SA according to Makefile.PL Michael Scheidell (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 17:04:38 EDT)
    • Re: prerequisites for SA according to Makefile.PL Kai Schaetzl (Sat Aug 18 2007 - 06:31:36 EDT)
• Query REg blacklist sushma (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 15:11:11 EDT)
  • Re: Query REg blacklist Matus UHLAR - fantomas (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 17:10:58 EDT)
  • Re: Query REg blacklist Matt Kettler (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 22:16:36 EDT)
• Sneaky b@stard slipped through Rick Zeman (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 13:09:34 EDT)
  • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Bill Landry (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 13:47:45 EDT)
  • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Andy Jezierski (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 14:03:31 EDT)
  • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Kai Schaetzl (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 14:31:25 EDT)
  • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Rick Zeman (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 15:45:23 EDT)
    • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through John Rudd (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:02:29 EDT)
      • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Duane Hill (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:17:21 EDT)
      • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Loren Wilton (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 23:11:02 EDT)
      • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through SM (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:23:53 EDT)
      • R: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Giampaolo Tomassoni (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 16:58:20 EDT)
      • Re: R: Sneaky b@stard slipped through David B Funk (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 17:14:43 EDT)
      • Re: R: Sneaky b@stard slipped through John D. Hardin (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 17:13:25 EDT)
      • Re: R: Sneaky b@stard slipped through SM (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 17:25:35 EDT)
      • Re: Sneaky b@stard slipped through Loren Wilton (Fri Aug 17 2007 - 23:15:24 EDT)