Mailing List Archive For users@apache.org Sep 2007 By Date

• Sun Sep 30 2007 - 13:01:49 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? Michelle Konzack 
• Sun Sep 30 2007 - 12:48:02 EDT
  • A belly laugh is a *good* way to start the day John D. Hardin 
• Sun Sep 30 2007 - 12:45:15 EDT
  • would you trust these people :) hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Sun Sep 30 2007 - 11:39:15 EDT
  • Re: prefork: child states: II Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 20:31:47 EDT
  • Re: Low resource rules Loren Wilton 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 14:43:55 EDT
  • Low resource rules John Schmerold 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 13:44:39 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Jari Fredriksson 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 10:27:55 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Nigel Frankcom 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 05:58:30 EDT
  • prefork: child states: II Obantec Support 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 03:30:12 EDT
  • Re: Odd Memory problem: SA NOT using available memory Loren Wilton 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 03:22:58 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? Loren Wilton 
• Sat Sep 29 2007 - 03:21:30 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? Loren Wilton 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 21:24:17 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Alex Woick 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 19:39:47 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Jari Fredriksson 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 19:31:28 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Jari Fredriksson 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:52:04 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Jerry Durand 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:38:29 EDT
  • Re: Odd Memory problem: SA NOT using available memory JOW 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:31:42 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) John Rudd 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:31:27 EDT
  • Re: Odd Memory problem: SA NOT using available memory JOW 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:17:11 EDT
  • Re: Odd Memory problem: SA NOT using available memory John D. Hardin 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:11:59 EDT
  • Re: Odd Memory problem: SA NOT using available memory Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:06:52 EDT
  • Odd Memory problem: SA NOT using available memory JOW 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 17:03:37 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) René Berber 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 16:42:06 EDT
  • RE: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) James E. Pratt 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 16:30:51 EDT
  • RE: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) hanz 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 16:18:22 EDT
  • RE: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Jason Bertoch 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 16:06:24 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) hanz 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 15:23:17 EDT
  • Re: reaching incoming connections queued max, what happens? micah 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 15:03:23 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Duane Hill 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 14:57:23 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Jari Fredriksson 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:38:01 EDT
  • Re: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution Bazooka Joe 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:20:27 EDT
  • Re: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution mouss 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:17:38 EDT
  • RE: New PayPal phish? Robert - elists 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:09:48 EDT
  • Re: Spamhaus Rules and Datafeed Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:01:23 EDT
  • reaching incoming connections queued max, what happens? Micah Anderson 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:01:06 EDT
  • Re: R: New domains (was: URIWhois plugin) Jeff Chan 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 13:02:24 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? Jari Fredriksson 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 12:55:24 EDT
  • RE: New PayPal phish? Simon Standley 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 12:37:14 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? Evan Platt 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 12:33:07 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? John D. Hardin 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:48:53 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Alex Woick 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:34:11 EDT
  • Re: Perl error after upgrade to 3.2.3 Rank1st 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:32:47 EDT
  • RE: New PayPal phish? Skip 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:23:26 EDT
  • Re: Spamhaus Rules and Datafeed Duane Hill 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:10:45 EDT
  • New PayPal phish? Kenneth Porter 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 11:01:46 EDT
  • Re: Spamhaus Rules and Datafeed Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:59:14 EDT
  • Re: R: New domains (was: URIWhois plugin) Kenneth Porter 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:55:16 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Micah Anderson 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:51:18 EDT
  • Re: Spamhaus Rules and Datafeed Duane Hill 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:39:39 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems micah 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:37:00 EDT
  • Re: Spamhaus Rules and Datafeed Vivek Khera 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:14:01 EDT
  • Spamhaus Rules and Datafeed Duane Hill 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:10:09 EDT
  • Re: R: New domains Jonas Eckerman 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 10:07:07 EDT
  • RE: SA user users whitelist @ SMTP time Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 09:56:54 EDT
  • Re: SA user users whitelist @ SMTP time Paul Griffith 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 09:49:33 EDT
  • RE: SA user users whitelist @ SMTP time Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 09:40:00 EDT
  • SA user users whitelist @ SMTP time Paul Griffith 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 01:37:16 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. cpayne 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 00:37:45 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. cpayne 
• Fri Sep 28 2007 - 00:24:01 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. cpayne 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 23:16:42 EDT
  • Re: New domains (was: URIWhois plugin) Dave Pooser 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 21:39:01 EDT
  • Re: New domains (was: URIWhois plugin) Jeff Chan 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 21:24:18 EDT
  • RE: URIWhois-0.02 Jeff Chan 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 14:03:32 EDT
  • R: R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 13:56:06 EDT
  • reinstall Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus night duke 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 13:22:22 EDT
  • Re: R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 13:20:00 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Kelson 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 13:05:11 EDT
  • R: New domains (was: URIWhois plugin) Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 12:58:33 EDT
  • R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 12:53:41 EDT
  • R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 12:16:32 EDT
  • New domains (was: URIWhois plugin) Jonas Eckerman 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 12:13:39 EDT
  • Re: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Kris Deugau 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 11:46:36 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems John D. Hardin 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 11:15:33 EDT
  • RE: URIWhois-0.02 Bret Miller 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 10:47:39 EDT
  • RE: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution Gary V 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 09:25:41 EDT
  • Re[2]: Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others Dietmar Braun 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 08:37:45 EDT
  • R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 08:16:34 EDT
  • R: Async timeouts in SA Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 08:14:24 EDT
  • AW: URIWhois-0.02 Starckjohann, Ove 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 07:58:24 EDT
  • Re: Async timeouts in SA Mark Martinec 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 07:44:35 EDT
  • Re: Async timeouts in SA Justin Mason 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 05:14:15 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Alex Woick 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 05:01:11 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Mark Martinec 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 04:16:44 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribe Nigel Frankcom 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 03:59:26 EDT
  • unsubscribe Livitin Sergey 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 03:53:27 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 03:51:03 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 02:59:53 EDT
  • Re: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Jeff Chan 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 01:28:11 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems micah 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 01:23:19 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail David B Funk 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 01:21:58 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems micah 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 01:11:09 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems micah 
• Thu Sep 27 2007 - 00:08:29 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems Michael Parker 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 23:27:51 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems micah 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 22:28:27 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Olivier Nicole 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 22:17:46 EDT
  • RE: Milter vs. Procmail Michael Scheidell 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 22:16:15 EDT
  • RE: Milter vs. Procmail Michael Scheidell 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 22:15:51 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Raquel 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 22:00:51 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Olivier Nicole 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 21:06:16 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail Raquel 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 20:54:05 EDT
  • Re: Bayes innodb problems John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 20:50:13 EDT
  • Re: Milter vs. Procmail John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 20:20:00 EDT
  • Bayes innodb problems Micah Anderson 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 20:03:20 EDT
  • Re: R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Dave Koontz 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 20:02:10 EDT
  • Milter vs. Procmail Raquel 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 19:42:17 EDT
  • R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 19:20:38 EDT
  • R: R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:57:42 EDT
  • Re: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 SM 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:56:13 EDT
  • Re: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution Matt Kettler 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:49:37 EDT
  • Re: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Dave Koontz 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:55:26 EDT
  • Re: R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:46:08 EDT
  • R: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:40:57 EDT
  • RE: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution tuxbeagle 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:31:56 EDT
  • Re: R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:32:15 EDT
  • R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:20:52 EDT
  • Re: R: URIWhois-0.02 SM 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 17:55:21 EDT
  • Re: R: URIWhois-0.02 John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 17:50:17 EDT
  • R: R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 17:26:41 EDT
  • Re: R: URIWhois-0.02 Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 16:48:26 EDT
  • R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 16:22:13 EDT
  • RE: URIWhois-0.02 SM 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 14:09:12 EDT
  • SA behavior in Ensim Pro X Spam-Filter vs in MailScanner 'Roger Ide' 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 15:10:50 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 14:21:54 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John Calvert 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 14:18:29 EDT
  • R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 14:16:34 EDT
  • RE: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution Gary V 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 14:11:37 EDT
  • Re: URIWhois-0.02 Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 13:56:23 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Raquel 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 13:51:55 EDT
  • RE: URIWhois-0.02 Robert - elists 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 13:40:27 EDT
  • Re: URIWhois-0.02 Dallas Engelken 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 13:31:19 EDT
  • RE: TIMEOUT Jean-Paul Natola 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 12:55:01 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 12:34:44 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John Calvert 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 12:26:39 EDT
  • Re: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution tuxbeagle 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 11:56:12 EDT
  • RE: URIWhois-0.02 Robert - elists 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 11:51:49 EDT
  • Re: URIWhois-0.02 Jeff Chan 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 11:38:34 EDT
  • Re: R: URIWhois plugin Jeff Chan 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 11:10:33 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL James Lay 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 10:50:52 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Chris St. Pierre 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 10:35:01 EDT
  • Re: FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP for static addresses? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 10:33:38 EDT
  • Re: too high score with similar rules: DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX and FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 10:29:27 EDT
  • Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL James Lay 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 09:14:34 EDT
  • R: URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 09:11:20 EDT
  • URIWhois-0.02 Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 09:01:17 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mizzio 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 07:01:49 EDT
  • R: URIWhois plugin Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 06:12:13 EDT
  • Re: Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others mouss 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 03:44:15 EDT
  • Re[2]: Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others Dietmar Braun 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 03:30:11 EDT
  • Re[2]: Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others Dietmar Braun 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 03:18:14 EDT
  • Re: URIWhois plugin Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
• Wed Sep 26 2007 - 02:05:21 EDT
  • Re: URIWhois plugin Jeff Chan 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 21:41:49 EDT
  • URIWhois plugin Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 20:27:15 EDT
  • Re: looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution Matt Kettler 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 19:14:55 EDT
  • looking into spamassassin mail proxy solution tuxbeagle 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 19:09:07 EDT
  • Re: 'spamc/spamassassin' crashing with overlong blank line spams? Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 17:38:31 EDT
  • Re: Converting to MySQL Raquel 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:54:06 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:32:04 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John Calvert 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:24:30 EDT
  • deprecated rules Joe Zitnik 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:23:23 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Evan Platt 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:20:05 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Daniel J McDonald 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:15:51 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:03:38 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 15:01:58 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 14:50:39 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Daniel J McDonald 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 14:50:06 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Evan Platt 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 14:45:52 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 14:38:39 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 14:22:10 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 13:52:33 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 13:39:15 EDT
  • Re: OT: How to report a known spammer company? Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 13:25:45 EDT
  • SA config questions. Gomes, Rich 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 13:20:16 EDT
  • Re: OT: How to report a known spammer company? John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 12:24:54 EDT
  • RE: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 12:24:02 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 11:04:01 EDT
  • network tests Miguel 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 09:02:26 EDT
  • OT: How to report a known spammer company? Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 08:15:54 EDT
  • Re: Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others Daniel J McDonald 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 07:54:57 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 not catching any emails Dave Addey 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 06:52:07 EDT
  • Re: Problem logging from SA when running Amavisd Mark Martinec 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 06:39:24 EDT
  • Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others Dietmar Braun 
• Tue Sep 25 2007 - 06:19:03 EDT
  • RE: sender name same as recipient name Leon Kolchinsky 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 23:49:49 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 22:27:04 EDT
  • Re: is this a bug? trying to avoid beeing marked as spam Loren Wilton 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 20:48:40 EDT
  • Re: is this a bug? trying to avoid beeing marked as spam greenone 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 20:42:18 EDT
  • Re: TIMEOUT Matt Kettler 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 20:42:17 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 20:26:16 EDT
  • RE: Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter? Was RE: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Michael Scheidell 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 20:17:08 EDT
  • Re: Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter? Was RE: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Clifton Royston 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 18:50:29 EDT
  • Re: is this a bug? trying to avoid beeing marked as spam Loren Wilton 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 18:44:33 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 18:30:58 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Dave Pooser 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 18:12:36 EDT
  • Re: [AMaViS-user] Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter? Was RE: Q about mail proxy servers and setups Jo Rhett 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 18:13:48 EDT
  • Re: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Jo Rhett 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:58:37 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:57:38 EDT
  • Re: sender name same as recipient name John D. Hardin 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:30:06 EDT
  • sender name same as recipient name feral 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:18:26 EDT
  • Re: Converting to MySQL Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 17:12:05 EDT
  • Re: Converting to MySQL Ed Kasky 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 16:41:44 EDT
  • RE: is this a bug? trying to avoid beeing marked as spam Skip 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 16:26:16 EDT
  • is this a bug? trying to avoid beeing marked as spam greenone 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 16:19:35 EDT
  • Re: Problem logging from SA when running Amavisd Jeff Moss 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 16:10:06 EDT
  • Re: Confusing issue regarding SPF_FAIL and local delivery John D. Hardin 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 15:44:47 EDT
  • Converting to MySQL Raquel 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 14:04:43 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. Mark Martinec 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 13:24:49 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. David B Funk 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 12:52:04 EDT
  • too high score with similar rules: DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX and FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 12:13:54 EDT
  • FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP for static addresses? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 10:45:18 EDT
  • TIMEOUT Jean-Paul Natola 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 10:25:16 EDT
  • Re: Some clarification on debug message Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 10:20:25 EDT
  • Some clarification on debug message Asif Iqbal 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 08:59:21 EDT
  • Re: Q about mail proxy servers and setups Mark Martinec 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 08:42:27 EDT
  • Re: Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter? Was RE: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups mouss 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 08:26:50 EDT
  • Re: Q about mail proxy servers and setups mouss 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 08:21:26 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. Matthias Haegele 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 07:34:07 EDT
  • RE: Q about mail proxy servers and setups Michael Scheidell 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 06:14:25 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 06:09:11 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. Matthias Haegele 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 06:09:20 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 06:03:44 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 not catching any emails Dave Addey 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 05:47:12 EDT
  • Re: Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. Matthias Haegele 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 05:34:12 EDT
  • Re: Q about mail proxy servers and setups Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 04:27:47 EDT
  • Every e-mail is now getting a new score, creating a lot of false postive. cpayne 
• Mon Sep 24 2007 - 00:07:13 EDT
  • RE: Q about mail proxy servers and setups David B Funk 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 20:31:04 EDT
  • Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter? Was RE: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 20:27:18 EDT
  • RE: Q about mail proxy servers and setups Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 20:17:59 EDT
  • RE: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 16:35:10 EDT
  • Re: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Clifton Royston 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 17:24:01 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Magnus Holmgren 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 13:08:09 EDT
  • Re: Confusing issue regarding SPF_FAIL and local delivery Magnus Holmgren 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 16:59:13 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mouss 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 16:53:29 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mouss 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 16:24:06 EDT
  • Re: Forwarding and spamassassin... mouss 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 16:24:46 EDT
  • Re: Q about mail proxy servers and setups mouss 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 15:10:16 EDT
  • Re: [AMaViS-user] Q about mail proxy servers and setups Jo Rhett 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 13:50:43 EDT
  • Q about mail proxy servers and setups Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 13:29:03 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mizzio 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 12:50:04 EDT
  • Re: Confusing issue regarding SPF_FAIL and local delivery John D. Hardin 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 12:09:04 EDT
  • Re: Forwarding and spamassassin... maillist 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 11:20:05 EDT
  • Re: Forwarding and spamassassin... James Lay 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 11:16:05 EDT
  • Re: Forwarding and spamassassin... Evan Platt 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 11:11:46 EDT
  • Re: Forwarding and spamassassin... Matt Kettler 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 10:53:33 EDT
  • Forwarding and spamassassin... mel goldberg 
• Sun Sep 23 2007 - 05:13:53 EDT
  • Re: Confusing issue regarding SPF_FAIL and local delivery Jari Fredriksson 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 10:07:15 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter John D. Hardin 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 07:40:35 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Dave Koontz 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 07:40:19 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Mick Pollard 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 07:33:27 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mizzio 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 05:31:02 EDT
  • Re: config: failed to parse line Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 05:09:30 EDT
  • RE: OT - massive newsletter Kenneth Porter 
• Sat Sep 22 2007 - 02:42:47 EDT
  • Re: New distribution rule not working ? Matthias Leisi 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 18:56:07 EDT
  • Re: Re: OT: Spamtraps François Rousseau 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 15:45:09 EDT
  • Re: Problem logging from SA when running Amavisd Mark Martinec 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 14:48:08 EDT
  • Re: Parsing Received Headers Thomas Kishel 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 13:45:15 EDT
  • Re: Problem logging from SA when running Amavisd Jeff Moss 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 13:19:56 EDT
  • R: Non-DNS async support Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 13:05:02 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.9 not catching any emails Tom Ray 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 12:24:55 EDT
  • Re: Mail Classification Kelson 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 11:39:08 EDT
  • Re: New distribution rule not working ? Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 11:25:22 EDT
  • New distribution rule not working ? Richard Smits 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 10:59:23 EDT
  • config: failed to parse line Micah Anderson 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 10:48:17 EDT
  • SpamAssassin 3.1.9 not catching any emails Dave Addey 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 09:36:58 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Per Jessen 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 07:24:40 EDT
  • Re: Mail Classification Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 07:02:53 EDT
  • RE: Delays in message processing Randal, Phil 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 05:41:34 EDT
  • Delays in message processing Roman Serbski 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 05:21:08 EDT
  • Re: Mail Classification Srilatha 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 02:52:57 EDT
  • Re: Mail Classification Per Jessen 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 02:34:04 EDT
  • Mail Classification Srilatha 
• Fri Sep 21 2007 - 00:25:54 EDT
  • Re: SA is looping Olivier Nicole 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 20:31:38 EDT
  • RE: Re: OT: Spamtraps Michael Scheidell 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 20:22:53 EDT
  • Re: SA not working? (newby) Jason Haar 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 19:57:35 EDT
  • Re: Problem logging from SA when running Amavisd Mark Martinec 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 19:02:27 EDT
  • Re: can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule Matt Kettler 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 18:42:45 EDT
  • Re: SA not working? (newby) Evan Platt 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 18:37:57 EDT
  • SA not working? (newby) Waz 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 16:55:57 EDT
  • Re: can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule Dale Carstensen 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 16:27:14 EDT
  • Re: OT: Spamtraps NFN Smith 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 16:04:10 EDT
  • Problem logging from SA when running Amavisd Jeff Moss 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 11:25:12 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? François Rousseau 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 11:16:17 EDT
  • Unexpected continuation byte James Lay 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 09:29:48 EDT
  • Re: Non-DNS async support Mark Martinec 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 08:07:18 EDT
  • RE: bayes_seen = 256GB Proctor, Scott 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 07:03:36 EDT
  • R: R: Non-DNS async support Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 06:01:46 EDT
  • SA is looping Olivier Nicole 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 05:44:46 EDT
  • Re: R: Non-DNS async support Justin Mason 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 04:52:53 EDT
  • Re: hardware accelerated regexps Pawel Sasin 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 04:03:52 EDT
  • Re: R: Non-DNS async support Mark Martinec 
• Thu Sep 20 2007 - 01:59:43 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Graham Murray 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 22:52:24 EDT
  • Re: R: bayes_seen = 256GB Loren Wilton 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 22:47:27 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Loren Wilton 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 22:29:21 EDT
  • Re: R: bayes_seen = 256GB mfahey 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 19:56:16 EDT
  • Re: (old?) sa hang @ "bayes: can't use estimation method for expiry" snowcrash+sa 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 19:44:51 EDT
  • Re: (old?) sa hang @ "bayes: can't use estimation method for expiry" Theo Van Dinter 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 19:42:18 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Theo Van Dinter 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 19:41:46 EDT
  • Re: (old?) sa hang @ "bayes: can't use estimation method for expiry" snowcrash+sa 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 19:05:38 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Dave Koontz 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 19:15:19 EDT
  • R: bayes_seen = 256GB Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 18:50:49 EDT
  • Re: Rewriting header fields help please mouss 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 18:11:02 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Michael Parker 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 18:03:44 EDT
  • Re: 'spamc/spamassassin' crashing with overlong blank line spams? Chr. v. Stuckrad 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:55:20 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Dave Koontz 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:55:58 EDT
  • Weird error James Lay 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:38:31 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Steven Stern 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:32:17 EDT
  • R: bayes_seen = 256GB Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:30:47 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Duane Hill 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:28:28 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Theo Van Dinter 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:25:18 EDT
  • R: Non-DNS async support Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:23:50 EDT
  • Re: bayes_seen = 256GB Mr. Gus 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:11:19 EDT
  • bayes_seen = 256GB mfahey 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 17:02:12 EDT
  • Re: Non-DNS async support Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 16:59:41 EDT
  • Re: (old?) sa hang @ "bayes: can't use estimation method for expiry" Theo Van Dinter 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 16:35:25 EDT
  • Re: add_header and Bayes Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 16:09:56 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Bob Proulx 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 15:56:27 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Bob Proulx 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 14:29:16 EDT
  • add_header and Bayes Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 14:26:48 EDT
  • Confusing issue regarding SPF_FAIL and local delivery arjones85 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 14:13:28 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 13:54:01 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 13:41:16 EDT
  • Non-DNS async support Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 12:49:09 EDT
  • Re: 'spamc/spamassassin' crashing with overlong blank line spams? Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 11:34:47 EDT
  • (old?) sa hang @ "bayes: can't use estimation method for expiry" snowcrash+sa 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 11:17:20 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 11:14:48 EDT
  • Re: 'spamc/spamassassin' crashing with overlong blank line spams? John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 11:14:25 EDT
  • RE: OT - massive newsletter Randal, Phil 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 10:58:46 EDT
  • Re: spamd and plugins Mark Martinec 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 10:49:54 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Kris Deugau 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 10:18:16 EDT
  • Re: SQL error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock Michael Parker 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:18:30 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:16:25 EDT
  • RE: OT - massive newsletter Randal, Phil 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:09:26 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mizzio 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 07:01:10 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 06:34:56 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter mizzio 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 06:33:32 EDT
  • the (sorted) SPAM that CHANGED my LIFE jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 06:32:17 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Paolo Cravero 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 06:30:59 EDT
  • Re: OT - massive newsletter Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 06:07:01 EDT
  • OT - massive newsletter mizzio 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 04:07:20 EDT
  • SQL error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock pennywise 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 00:54:24 EDT
  • Re: 'spamc/spamassassin' crashing with overlong blank line spams? Matt Kettler 
• Wed Sep 19 2007 - 00:12:28 EDT
  • Re: What is more annoying than being joe-jobbed? Bob Proulx 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 23:55:17 EDT
  • What is more annoying than being joe-jobbed? John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 15:48:26 EDT
  • 'spamc/spamassassin' crashing with overlong blank line spams? Chr. v. Stuckrad 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 15:06:17 EDT
  • Re: Problems with blacklist still! John D. Hardin 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 14:44:15 EDT
  • Re: Problems with blacklist still! Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 14:27:56 EDT
  • Problems with blacklist still! Michael Chapman 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 14:00:59 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin not starting - new install Jim Maul 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 13:23:03 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin not starting - new install Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 13:12:07 EDT
  • Re: hardware accelerated regexps Justin Mason 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 13:07:34 EDT
  • RE: spamassassin not starting - new install Michael Martinell 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 13:02:44 EDT
  • R: Spamtraps Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 12:55:44 EDT
  • Re: OT: Spamtraps Kelson 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 12:50:08 EDT
  • RE: spamassassin not starting - new install Michael Martinell 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 12:38:13 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin not starting - new install Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 12:31:18 EDT
  • Re: SA only seeing certain mails larkim 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 12:25:46 EDT
  • spamassassin not starting - new install Michael Martinell 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 12:06:45 EDT
  • Re: multiple check für one mail normal? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 11:59:05 EDT
  • Re: hardware accelerated regexps Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 11:42:12 EDT
  • Re: Spamtraps Andy Sutton 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 11:11:39 EDT
  • Re: re the 419 scam apologizing for 419 scams Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 10:41:54 EDT
  • Re: Spamtraps Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 10:37:59 EDT
  • Re: OT: Spamtraps Matt 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 10:08:23 EDT
  • OT: Spamtraps ram 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 09:28:37 EDT
  • Re: Bayes database corrupted Duane Hill 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 08:19:42 EDT
  • RE: Bayes database corrupted Listas 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 08:14:18 EDT
  • RE: Bayes database corrupted Martin.Hepworth 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 07:09:58 EDT
  • Bayes database corrupted Listas 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 05:28:04 EDT
  • Re: SA only seeing certain mails Matthias Haegele 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 05:09:32 EDT
  • Re: update from 3.1.7 Adam Wilbraham 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 04:19:12 EDT
  • Re: update from 3.1.7 Adam Wilbraham 
• Tue Sep 18 2007 - 02:21:38 EDT
  • Re: update from 3.1.7 Rajkumar S 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 21:02:09 EDT
  • Re: multiple check for one mail normal? Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 16:45:48 EDT
  • update from 3.1.7 infolistas listas 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 14:47:29 EDT
  • Re: multiple check für one mail normal? AlexL1981 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 12:18:28 EDT
  • Re: multiple check für one mail normal? Jari Fredriksson 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 11:59:15 EDT
  • Re: multiple check für one mail normal? AlexL1981 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 10:52:45 EDT
  • Re: multiple check für one mail normal? Jari Fredriksson 
  • Re: multiple check für one mail normal? Jari Fredriksson 
• Mon Sep 17 2007 - 10:21:55 EDT
  • multiple check für one mail normal? AlexL1981 
• Sun Sep 16 2007 - 14:24:17 EDT
  • Re: installing without root permission Justin Mason 
• Sun Sep 16 2007 - 08:15:47 EDT
  • RE: installing without root permission Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Sep 16 2007 - 07:05:02 EDT
  • installing without root permission Geno 
• Sun Sep 16 2007 - 07:04:55 EDT
  • installing without root permission Geno 
• Sat Sep 15 2007 - 23:29:15 EDT
  • Re: sa-compile require a restart afterwards? micah 
• Sat Sep 15 2007 - 22:26:34 EDT
  • Re: sa-compile require a restart afterwards? Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Sat Sep 15 2007 - 19:46:02 EDT
  • sa-compile require a restart afterwards? micah 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 20:57:02 EDT
  • Re: Mail log errors about PerMsgStatus.pm Matt Kettler 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 20:34:25 EDT
  • Re: Display DCC results in headers Loren Wilton 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 19:18:43 EDT
  • Re: Compiling Rules Mr. Gus 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 16:19:04 EDT
  • Display DCC results in headers Mr. Gus 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 17:39:57 EDT
  • Re: Compiling Rules Mr. Gus 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 18:07:56 EDT
  • Display DCC results in headers Mr. Gus 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 18:05:37 EDT
  • Re: Compiling Rules Mr. Gus 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 16:27:29 EDT
  • Re: Compiling Rules Jared Hall 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 15:54:28 EDT
  • Compiling Rules Jason Bertoch 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 14:49:55 EDT
  • Re: spam and virus Ken Menzel 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 14:40:32 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jon Trulson 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 13:33:27 EDT
  • Mail log errors about PerMsgStatus.pm dvogel 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 12:46:54 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Nigel Frankcom 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 12:07:32 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jeff Shepherd 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 11:15:36 EDT
  • FW: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Josephine Walls 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:49:52 EDT
  • Re: spam and virus James Lay 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:46:03 EDT
  • Re: spam and virus François Rousseau 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:40:50 EDT
  • RE: spam and virus Randal, Phil 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:40:36 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? François Rousseau 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:38:53 EDT
  • spam and virus Dean Clapper 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:36:36 EDT
  • RE: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 09:11:03 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Crocomoth 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 05:33:45 EDT
  • Re: hardware accelerated regexps Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 05:18:26 EDT
  • Re: hardware accelerated regexps Justin Mason 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 04:41:29 EDT
  • hardware accelerated regexps Pawel Sasin 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 04:22:14 EDT
  • SA only seeing certain mails larkim 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 02:25:05 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Per Jessen 
• Fri Sep 14 2007 - 01:30:49 EDT
  • RE: Suggestion to developers Micha³ Jêczalik 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 20:40:27 EDT
  • Re: Objective site to run spamcheck against? Jerry Durand 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 20:36:11 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Meng Weng Wong 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 20:35:52 EDT
  • Objective site to run spamcheck against? Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 20:22:58 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Phil Barnett 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 18:46:55 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers jdow 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 17:24:26 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers jdow 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:35:40 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin management by file deletion newby 23 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:34:49 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Bart Schaefer 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:13:31 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin management by file deletion Theo Van Dinter 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 15:33:11 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Justin Mason 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 15:28:25 EDT
  • Re: re the 419 scam apologizing for 419 scams Bob McClure Jr 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 14:57:23 EDT
  • Re: re the 419 scam apologizing for 419 scams Loren Wilton 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 13:10:11 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Matt Kettler 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 13:03:39 EDT
  • Re: re the 419 scam apologizing for 419 scams Rick Zeman 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 11:56:46 EDT
  • re the 419 scam apologizing for 419 scams John D. Hardin 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 10:24:08 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin management by file deletion Kris Deugau 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:49:19 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:47:45 EDT
  • Re: Automatic Deployment ram 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:45:22 EDT
  • RE: How to analyze scan time ram 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:19:46 EDT
  • Re: Automatic Deployment Rick Macdougall 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:18:36 EDT
  • RE: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Rick Cooper 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:12:36 EDT
  • Automatic Deployment Rense Buijen 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 09:03:17 EDT
  • RE: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Rick Cooper 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 08:50:44 EDT
  • Re: How to analyze scan time Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 08:33:59 EDT
  • RE: How to analyze scan time Skip 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 08:23:56 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Crocomoth 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 06:45:25 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin management by file deletion newby 23 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 06:41:33 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Matt Kettler 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 06:02:10 EDT
  • RE: Unique nigerian spam ram 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 05:53:55 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Crocomoth 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 02:38:20 EDT
  • RE: Unique nigerian spam Rob Sterenborg 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 02:25:05 EDT
  • Re: How to analyze scan time ram 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 02:04:27 EDT
  • Unique nigerian spam ram 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 02:00:51 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Nigel Frankcom 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 00:53:24 EDT
  • Re: Spam fighting technology techniques not welcome on Spamassassin list? Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 00:49:20 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 00:44:40 EDT
  • Spam fighting technology techniques not welcome on Spamassassin list? Marc Perkel 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 00:26:18 EDT
  • How to analyze scan time François Rousseau 
• Thu Sep 13 2007 - 00:05:01 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 23:44:09 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers John Rudd 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 23:36:33 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 23:26:02 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Phil Barnett 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 23:18:11 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers maillist 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 22:53:23 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jared Hall 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 22:14:50 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 22:08:17 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Tuc at T-B-O-H 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 21:09:08 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 19:21:04 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 19:12:42 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:52:47 EDT
  • RE: Suggestion to developers Jason Burzenski 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 19:08:15 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 18:48:36 EDT
  • Re: Suggestion to developers Matt Kettler 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 17:50:08 EDT
  • Re: Authenticated SMTP and RBLs Mark Martinec 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 17:17:57 EDT
  • Re: spamassassin management by file deletion Kris Deugau 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 16:34:53 EDT
  • spamassassin management by file deletion newby 23 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 16:04:58 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jon Trulson 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 14:36:50 EDT
  • Re: Authenticated SMTP and RBLs hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 14:13:14 EDT
  • Re: debbie-dealz / frosty-saver / got-hyrda / aero-dog spam John D. Hardin 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 13:59:59 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers John Rudd 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 13:57:29 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jeff Shepherd 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 13:33:03 EDT
  • FW: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jason Bertoch 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 13:20:53 EDT
  • Re: debbie-dealz / frosty-saver / got-hyrda / aero-dog spam Brian Wilson 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 12:37:15 EDT
  • Re: debbie-dealz / frosty-saver / got-hyrda / aero-dog spam Jari Fredriksson 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:53:10 EDT
  • RE: Suggestion to developers Crocomoth 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:44:03 EDT
  • RE: Suggestion to developers Crocomoth 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:20:45 EDT
  • RE: Suggestion to developers Skip Brott 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:20:23 EDT
  • Re: debbie-dealz / frosty-saver / got-hyrda / aero-dog spam Benjamin E. Zeller 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:17:47 EDT
  • Summary - Handling Spam Surges Paul Griffith 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:04:40 EDT
  • debbie-dealz / frosty-saver / got-hyrda / aero-dog spam Brian Wilson 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:57:19 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Matthias Häker 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:53:20 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin wins 2007 InfoWorld "Best of Open Source Software" award Thomas Cameron 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:42:26 EDT
  • Suggestion to developers Crocomoth 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:29:33 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:22:58 EDT
  • Scan Time Problem After Upgrade gascione 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:11:25 EDT
  • RE: SpamAssassin wins 2007 InfoWorld "Best of Open Source Softwar e" award Chris Santerre 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 10:08:24 EDT
  • RE: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Chris Santerre 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 09:48:12 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Duane Hill 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 09:47:05 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jeff Shepherd 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 09:40:56 EDT
  • Re: FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Ken A 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 09:39:35 EDT
  • RE: SpamAssassin wins 2007 InfoWorld "Best of Open Source Software" award chteh 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 09:29:37 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin wins 2007 InfoWorld "Best of Open Source Software" award Duane Hill 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 09:15:06 EDT
  • Re: Perl error after upgrade to 3.2.3 neil 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 08:53:52 EDT
  • FW: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Jason Bertoch 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 08:32:51 EDT
  • SpamAssassin wins 2007 InfoWorld "Best of Open Source Software" award Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 07:06:10 EDT
  • Perl error after upgrade to 3.2.3 Jonathan Armitage 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 04:24:15 EDT
  • Re: Authenticated SMTP and RBLs Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 04:19:28 EDT
  • Re Authenticated SMTP and RBLs hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 03:36:03 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Per Jessen 
• Wed Sep 12 2007 - 03:29:19 EDT
  • Authenticated SMTP and RBLs Rajkumar S 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 19:06:55 EDT
  • Re: List of 700,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 18:44:21 EDT
  • Re: Problem after upgraded. Mark Martinec 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 04:24:58 EDT
  • Problem after upgraded. cpayne(at)webmail.magigames.net 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 17:36:31 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Kenneth Porter 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 16:04:10 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Matthias Haeker 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 15:43:41 EDT
  • [Fwd: Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers] Matthias Haeker 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 15:30:02 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 15:20:51 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Matthias Häker 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 15:15:51 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Per Jessen 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 13:40:35 EDT
  • Re: update problem with PerMsgStatus.pm msasson 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 13:10:35 EDT
  • [Fwd: Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers] Adam Lanier 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 12:20:57 EDT
  • How to search X-Spam-Report in Mail.app? Robert Nicholson 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 11:41:27 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Adam Lanier 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 11:40:53 EDT
  • RE: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers James E. Pratt 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 11:30:12 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 05:57:45 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Micke Andersson 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 05:47:25 EDT
  • RE: Handling Spam Surges Michael Scheidell 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 05:43:21 EDT
  • RE: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Michael Scheidell 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 04:31:28 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Kai Schaetzl 
• Tue Sep 11 2007 - 03:58:33 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Stuart Gall 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 22:15:03 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Thomas Schulz 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 15:35:13 EDT
  • Re: Handling Spam Surges David B Funk 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 14:51:03 EDT
  • Re: Handling Spam Surges Aaron Wolfe 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 14:09:11 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Rick Macdougall 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 13:44:12 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Michael Parker 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 13:42:49 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 13:35:03 EDT
  • Re: List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Duane Hill 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 13:26:09 EDT
  • List of 600,000 IP addresses of virus infected computers Marc Perkel 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 12:48:20 EDT
  • Handling Spam Surges Paul Griffith 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 12:47:24 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. Kris Deugau 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 06:01:16 EDT
  • Re: how do I disable a sub rule with __ Matt Kettler 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 04:07:30 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Stuart Gall 
• Mon Sep 10 2007 - 03:19:17 EDT
  • how do I disable a sub rule with __ ram 
• Sun Sep 09 2007 - 23:16:03 EDT
  • Re: required module out of date (revised, sorry) Nigel Frankcom 
• Sun Sep 09 2007 - 16:02:09 EDT
  • Re: is spamassassin using both processors? Tim Litwiller 
• Sun Sep 09 2007 - 14:32:06 EDT
  • Re: is spamassassin using both processors? John Thompson 
• Sun Sep 09 2007 - 11:32:29 EDT
  • required module out of date (revised, sorry) Geno 
• Sun Sep 09 2007 - 11:16:16 EDT
  • required module out of date Geno 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 14:06:24 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. Jerry Durand 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 13:25:22 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. RinkWorks 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 13:01:51 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 11:16:24 EDT
  • Re: HOME of non-existing users Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 11:06:17 EDT
  • Re: Don't use Bayes if the mail was already rewritten by spamassassin / multiple spamassassin servers in the delivery chain Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 09:24:57 EDT
  • Don't use Bayes if the mail was already rewritten by spamassassin / multiple spamassassin servers in the delivery chain Stefan Walk 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 02:17:45 EDT
  • Re: can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule Matt Kettler 
• Sat Sep 08 2007 - 02:11:16 EDT
  • Re: how many children Matt Kettler 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 23:12:21 EDT
  • Re: newbie question about bayesian filter maillist 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 22:54:55 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribe Evan Platt 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 22:49:52 EDT
  • unsubscribe Don Ireland 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 16:31:51 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... Kai Schaetzl 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 14:29:15 EDT
  • newbie question about bayesian filter Miguel 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 14:12:21 EDT
  • how many children Jean-Paul Natola 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 10:59:06 EDT
  • Re: eval method to add RHSBL John D. Hardin 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 10:09:54 EDT
  • Re: can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule Mark Martinec 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 09:49:29 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Chris Edwards 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 09:50:52 EDT
  • Re: eval method to add RHSBL Srilatha 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 08:56:03 EDT
  • Re: can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule ram 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 08:49:38 EDT
  • Re: eval method to add RHSBL ram 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 08:43:13 EDT
  • Re: do I need to adjust something on AWL Matt Kettler 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 08:36:33 EDT
  • Re: can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule Matt Kettler 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 08:02:45 EDT
  • can I specify timeouts for a specific DNS rule ram 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 05:19:49 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Justin Mason 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 04:00:44 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Matthias Haeker 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 03:20:21 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Jeff Chan 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 01:51:42 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Rajkumar S 
• Fri Sep 07 2007 - 00:29:02 EDT
  • eval method to add RHSBL Srilatha 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 19:10:31 EDT
  • Re: do I need to adjust something on AWL mouss 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 19:00:55 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... mouss 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 18:52:00 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? mouss 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 18:38:04 EDT
  • Re: HOME of non-existing users mouss 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 18:09:27 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Jason Haar 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:55:32 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Aaron Wolfe 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:48:30 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Kelson 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:16:10 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... Jari Fredriksson 
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... Jari Fredriksson 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:32:02 EDT
  • Re: is spamassassin using both processors? Bill Landry 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:22:41 EDT
  • RE: Who wants my spam - seriously! Robert - elists 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:08:42 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Mr. Gus 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 15:34:09 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... jdow 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 15:29:46 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... jdow 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 15:25:44 EDT
  • RE: Maybe I'm dense... Jean-Paul Natola 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 15:04:51 EDT
  • Re: is spamassassin using both processors? Jari Fredriksson 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 14:43:40 EDT
  • is spamassassin using both processors? Tim Litwiller 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 13:55:41 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... Evan Platt 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 13:55:33 EDT
  • Re: Maybe I'm dense... Bob McClure Jr 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 13:44:27 EDT
  • Maybe I'm dense... winkerbean 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 13:37:49 EDT
  • RE: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Johnson, S 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 13:30:21 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. Kris Deugau 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 12:11:00 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Rick Macdougall 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 12:09:49 EDT
  • Re: [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Jeff Chan 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 11:58:11 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. maillist 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 11:55:21 EDT
  • [OT] Seeing increase in smtp concurrency ? Rajkumar S 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 11:47:24 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed maillist 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 11:06:23 EDT
  • AW: do I need to adjust something on AWL Stefan Osterlitz 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 11:04:23 EDT
  • Re: Who wants my spam - seriously! Michael Parker 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:56:04 EDT
  • RE: Who wants my spam - seriously! Robert - elists 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:55:35 EDT
  • AW: spamd autolearn fails, spamassassin autolearn works?? - SOLVED Stefan Osterlitz 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:47:16 EDT
  • do I need to adjust something on AWL Tim Litwiller 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:35:19 EDT
  • Who wants my spam - seriously! Marc Perkel 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:34:57 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. Anthony Peacock 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:25:29 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. RinkWorks 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:24:20 EDT
  • Re: FPs for SUBJECT_FUZZY_MEDS Dave Pooser 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 10:11:45 EDT
  • FPs for SUBJECT_FUZZY_MEDS Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 09:09:06 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 08:54:46 EDT
  • Re: spamd autolearn fails, spamassassin autolearn works?? Matt Kettler 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 06:39:18 EDT
  • spamd autolearn fails, spamassassin autolearn works?? Stefan Osterlitz 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 06:30:38 EDT
  • Re: HOME of non-existing users Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 06:09:51 EDT
  • Re: forward the spam to another mailbox Zeuxi Gau 
• Thu Sep 06 2007 - 06:01:14 EDT
  • Re: HTML to text Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 21:54:49 EDT
  • Re: update problem with PerMsgStatus.pm Matt Kettler 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 21:37:05 EDT
  • HTML to text Sam Gundry 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 16:19:16 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. RinkWorks 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 15:45:33 EDT
  • Re: forward the spam to another mailbox mouss 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 15:40:22 EDT
  • Re: HOME of non-existing users mouss 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 15:37:42 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers mouss 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 14:49:37 EDT
  • RE: forward the spam to another mailbox Skip Brott 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 14:00:13 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers Justin Mason 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 13:26:48 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers Steve Freegard 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 13:19:57 EDT
  • Re: forward the spam to another mailbox Evan Platt 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 13:04:37 EDT
  • forward the spam to another mailbox Zeuxi Gau 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 12:39:09 EDT
  • Re: Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 12:33:36 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Kris Deugau 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 12:31:12 EDT
  • [SOLVED] Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 12:16:27 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 11:38:52 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers Yet Another Ninja 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 11:28:46 EDT
  • Bayesian filtering not kicking in, but it's trained. RinkWorks 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 11:27:03 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers Marc Perkel 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 10:46:27 EDT
  • Re: Spamasassin short circuit not working ram 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 10:31:58 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers ram 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 07:14:20 EDT
  • Re: Spamasassin short circuit not working Adam Stephens 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 05:48:52 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Peter Mikeska (MiKi) 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 05:27:08 EDT
  • HOME of non-existing users Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 05:10:44 EDT
  • Re: Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 04:50:22 EDT
  • Re: Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers mouss 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 03:25:41 EDT
  • Re: Manual sorting based on score count Jesse Molina 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 03:22:38 EDT
  • Re: Manual sorting based on score count Jesse Molina 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 02:33:52 EDT
  • Is there a test on blacklisted nameservers ram 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 02:22:15 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Dave Funk 
• Wed Sep 05 2007 - 00:56:20 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 20:12:32 EDT
  • Re: RulesDuJour Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 19:47:47 EDT
  • RE: RulesDuJour jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 18:09:14 EDT
  • update problem with PerMsgStatus.pm night duke 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 17:34:49 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed David B Funk 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 17:26:11 EDT
  • Re: Multiple rules for dynamic-looking IP addresses Dan Fulbright 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 17:06:20 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Ken A 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 14:38:51 EDT
  • RE: Parsing Received Headers Bret Miller 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 14:11:34 EDT
  • Re: Manual sorting based on score count Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 10:37:55 EDT
  • Re: Manual sorting based on score count Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 12:37:19 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 10:39:24 EDT
  • Re: my collegue id received as spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 12:32:18 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Kelson 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 10:13:51 EDT
  • Re: Which rules are used Robert Dudley 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 10:09:32 EDT
  • Re: Which rules are used Anthony Peacock 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 10:03:07 EDT
  • Which rules are used Claudia Burman 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 09:11:49 EDT
  • Re: Manual sorting based on score count OliverScott 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 05:44:34 EDT
  • RE: my collegue id received as spam Martin.Hepworth 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 05:38:58 EDT
  • RE: RulesDuJour Rob Sterenborg 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 05:06:50 EDT
  • Re: RulesDuJour Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 04:11:03 EDT
  • RE: RulesDuJour Rob Sterenborg 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 03:54:09 EDT
  • RE: my collegue id received as spam Martin.Hepworth 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 03:55:04 EDT
  • RE: RulesDuJour Rocco Scappatura 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 03:48:15 EDT
  • Manual sorting based on score count Jesse Molina 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 03:16:37 EDT
  • RE: my collegue id received as spam Martin.Hepworth 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 02:09:43 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Matthias Leisi 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 02:06:10 EDT
  • my collegue id received as spam Sg 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 01:36:35 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Tue Sep 04 2007 - 01:24:17 EDT
  • RE: autolearn=failed Rob Sterenborg 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 23:00:21 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 22:43:07 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 22:34:01 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Matt Kettler 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 22:30:16 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Matt Kettler 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 22:27:42 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 21:44:35 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 21:40:44 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Matt Kettler 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 21:39:40 EDT
  • Re: autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 21:31:03 EDT
  • autolearn=failed Raquel 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 19:09:41 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 18:07:27 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 17:31:25 EDT
  • RE: R: FuzzyOcr score limit Gary V 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 17:13:52 EDT
  • R: FuzzyOcr score limit Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 17:07:19 EDT
  • RE: FuzzyOcr score limit Gary V 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 14:47:51 EDT
  • FuzzyOcr score limit Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 14:01:13 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Justin Mason 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 11:27:36 EDT
  • Re: RulesDuJour Jari Fredriksson 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 08:23:11 EDT
  • Re: Parsing Received Headers Mark Martinec 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 05:38:51 EDT
  • RE: RulesDuJour Rocco Scappatura 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 05:17:08 EDT
  • Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process Richard Hobbs 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 04:53:19 EDT
  • Re: RulesDuJour Matthias Haegele 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 04:39:48 EDT
  • RulesDuJour Rocco Scappatura 
• Mon Sep 03 2007 - 03:47:54 EDT
  • RE: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Leon Kolchinsky 
• Sun Sep 02 2007 - 22:37:40 EDT
  • Re: whitelist_from question Matt Kettler 
• Sun Sep 02 2007 - 18:31:06 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Loren Wilton 
• Sun Sep 02 2007 - 18:24:30 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP SM 
• Sun Sep 02 2007 - 17:59:01 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP Joe Pranevich 
• Sun Sep 02 2007 - 17:27:56 EDT
  • Re: Outbound spam filtering for a large ISP