Mailing List Archive For users@apache.org Oct 2007 By Date

• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 04:03:05 EDT
  • Re: trusted_networks and RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 04:00:39 EDT
  • RE: MP3 Spam Martin.Hepworth 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 03:44:46 EDT
  • Re: MP3 Spam UxBoD 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 02:20:54 EDT
  • Re: Check $HOME for an ever growing razor-agent.log Bill Landry 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 02:17:54 EDT
  • Re: Check $HOME for an ever growing razor-agent.log Theo Van Dinter 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 02:01:25 EDT
  • Check $HOME for an ever growing razor-agent.log jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Fri Oct 19 2007 - 01:47:30 EDT
  • RE: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams Rob Sterenborg 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 23:01:45 EDT
  • Re: loadplugin TextCat from user_prefs Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 22:43:04 EDT
  • loadplugin TextCat from user_prefs jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 19:32:24 EDT
  • RE: upgrade question Michael Scheidell 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 19:03:05 EDT
  • Re: upgrade question Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 15:24:35 EDT
  • Re: MP3 Spam Justin Mason 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 14:30:16 EDT
  • Re: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 13:55:22 EDT
  • Re: Trusted relays and SPF usable envelope sender Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 13:45:06 EDT
  • MP3 Spam UxBoD 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 12:24:07 EDT
  • Re: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams Per Jessen 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 11:48:48 EDT
  • Re: upgrade question Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 11:07:52 EDT
  • upgrade question Chuck Campbell 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 11:02:52 EDT
  • Trusted relays and SPF usable envelope sender ram 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 10:57:54 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Randal, Phil 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 11:44:29 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM DAve 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 10:33:20 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing or just *deleting* emails from certain countries John D. Hardin 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 10:13:53 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Bart Schaefer 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 10:11:55 EDT
  • Re: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 09:35:16 EDT
  • RE: unsubscribed Steve Ingraham 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 08:36:56 EDT
  • Re: We need help with error messages Jeff Chan 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 13:45:10 EDT
  • We need help with error messages Alan Morgan 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 07:15:14 EDT
  • spam scores for reverse DNS YMGT 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 06:43:57 EDT
  • Re: Spamassassin and exim4 Mark Adams 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 06:24:34 EDT
  • Re: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams ram 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 05:56:58 EDT
  • Re: trusted_networks and RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* Lars Ippich 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 05:29:52 EDT
  • Re: trusted_networks and RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* Alex Woick 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 04:39:59 EDT
  • Re: How to block the bat! Matthias Haegele 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 04:25:50 EDT
  • Re: coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams Xueron Nee 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:51:38 EDT
  • coming to your inbox: mp3 stock spams Yet Another Ninja 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:43:17 EDT
  • Re: How to trust my "domain"? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:37:08 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing *or* just deleting emails from certain countries Per Jessen 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:31:53 EDT
  • Bouncing *or* just deleting emails from certain countries Chris 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:32:50 EDT
  • Re: trusted_networks and RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* Lars Ippich 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 03:16:56 EDT
  • Re: trusted_networks and RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* Matthias Leisi 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 02:17:31 EDT
  • Security sage rules again thru sa-update ram 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 02:07:49 EDT
  • Re: help with training bayesian filter Loren Wilton 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 02:04:10 EDT
  • Re: How to block the bat! Jeff Chan 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 01:59:24 EDT
  • Re: How to block the bat! Loren Wilton 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 01:52:00 EDT
  • Re: help with training bayesian filter Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 01:19:05 EDT
  • Re: help with training bayesian filter Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 18 2007 - 00:25:08 EDT
  • Re: help with training bayesian filter sinnerman 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 23:49:53 EDT
  • Re: help with training bayesian filter sinnerman 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 23:12:22 EDT
  • Re: How to block the bat! Matt Kettler 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 23:00:47 EDT
  • Re[2]: How to block the bat! Robert Braver 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 22:53:24 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Clay Davis 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 22:43:25 EDT
  • Re: How to block the bat! cpayne 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 22:26:32 EDT
  • Re: How to block the bat! Robert Braver 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 22:08:53 EDT
  • How to block the bat! cpayne 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 21:53:40 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Nigel Frankcom 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 20:19:26 EDT
  • trusted_networks and RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* Lars Ippich 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 20:08:37 EDT
  • Re: help with training bayesian filter Mr. Gus 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 19:27:52 EDT
  • help with training bayesian filter sinnerman 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 18:16:06 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed mouss 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 17:13:14 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Joey 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 17:01:15 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Jon Trulson 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 16:40:29 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Mr. Gus 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 16:04:18 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Joseph Brennan 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 15:58:03 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM John Rudd 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 15:58:24 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 15:47:58 EDT
  • FW: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Diffenderfer, Randy 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:48:55 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:48:41 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Randal, Phil 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:29:28 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Raquel 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:22:52 EDT
  • RE: How to trust my "domain"? James E. Pratt 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 14:11:32 EDT
  • Re: How to trust my "domain"? maillist 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 13:56:09 EDT
  • Re: How to trust my "domain"? Bob Proulx 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 12:45:21 EDT
  • RE: How to trust my "domain"? Skip 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 12:43:25 EDT
  • Re: How to trust my "domain"? Chris 'Xenon' Hanson 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 12:27:59 EDT
  • How to trust my "domain"? Skip 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 12:19:31 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM mizzio 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 12:07:28 EDT
  • RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM James E. Pratt 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 11:58:23 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Bart Schaefer 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 11:55:11 EDT
  • RE: unsubscribed Clay Davis 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 11:48:55 EDT
  • Re: Spamassassin and exim4 Steven Kurylo 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 10:54:55 EDT
  • Re: Bit OT but it's about SPAM Justin Mason 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 10:46:04 EDT
  • Bit OT but it's about SPAM Tom Ray 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 09:24:53 EDT
  • RE: uribl.com implementing ACLs Chris Santerre 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 08:05:35 EDT
  • Re: Bouncing or just *deleting* emails from certain countries Matt Kettler 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 08:00:00 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Matt Kettler 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 07:41:59 EDT
  • Re: test my auto-generated ruleset Justin Mason 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 07:30:10 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW ram 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 07:16:27 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW ram 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 06:56:31 EDT
  • 40 comcast. net detected as URI Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 05:58:30 EDT
  • Spamassassin and exim4 Mark Adams 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 05:53:07 EDT
  • Bouncing or just *deleting* emails from certain countries Chris 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 05:51:13 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Justin Mason 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 05:05:49 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Alex Woick 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 04:09:34 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 03:46:07 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 03:34:20 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 03:22:20 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 03:04:21 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 03:00:02 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 02:48:49 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 02:43:19 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 02:38:45 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Matthias Leisi 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 02:25:29 EDT
  • RE: unsubscribed Rob Sterenborg 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 02:08:22 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin cpayne 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 00:51:52 EDT
  • Re: way to change the header Matt Kettler 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 00:40:37 EDT
  • Re: DNSWL question Matt Kettler 
• Wed Oct 17 2007 - 00:06:25 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Matt Kettler 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 23:46:26 EDT
  • Re: test my auto-generated ruleset Larry Nedry 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 19:41:07 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin cpayne 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 19:22:26 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Bob Proulx 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 18:39:20 EDT
  • 40comcast.net detected as URI Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 18:16:49 EDT
  • RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 17:05:50 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Justin Mason 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:59:59 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Theo Van Dinter 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:52:41 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin cpayne 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:41:28 EDT
  • RE: unsubscribed Steve Ingraham 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:33:16 EDT
  • RE: unsubscribed Clay Davis 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:25:34 EDT
  • Re: refefine/extend a existing rule in 20_ratware.cf possible ?? Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 16:10:35 EDT
  • RE: unsubscribed Steve Ingraham 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 15:49:30 EDT
  • Re: refefine/extend a existing rule in 20_ratware.cf possible ?? Paul Griffith 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 15:15:36 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Clay Davis 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 14:57:00 EDT
  • Re: refefine/extend a existing rule in 20_ratware.cf possible ?? Joseph Brennan 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 14:48:32 EDT
  • RE: uribl.com implementing ACLs Joseph Brennan 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 13:40:12 EDT
  • Re: Sa-compile error Justin Mason 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 13:22:14 EDT
  • Sa-compile error Luis Hernán Otegui 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 13:20:35 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Alex Woick 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 12:59:02 EDT
  • refefine/extend a existing rule in 20_ratware.cf possible ?? Paul Griffith 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 12:26:12 EDT
  • Re: AWL: what would happen if... Theo Van Dinter 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 12:14:11 EDT
  • Re: uribl.com implementing ACLs John Rudd 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:49:50 EDT
  • RE: uribl.com implementing ACLs Chris Santerre 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:48:32 EDT
  • Re: Mailman cooler [Was Re: unsubscribed] SM 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:44:45 EDT
  • AWL: what would happen if... Mike Jackson 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:01:40 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 11:00:05 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Chris 'Xenon' Hanson 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:55:57 EDT
  • RE: Question about total effective of spamassassin Martin.Hepworth 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:46:17 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Kent Borg 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:35:37 EDT
  • Re: uribl.com implementing ACLs Rick Macdougall 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 10:25:12 EDT
  • uribl.com implementing ACLs Oli Schacher 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 09:03:59 EDT
  • Spamassassin - Some e-mails did not go through it Bruno Henrique de Oliveira 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 07:36:03 EDT
  • Re: DNSWL question Justin Mason 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 06:41:37 EDT
  • Re: DNSWL question Jonathan Armitage 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 06:31:45 EDT
  • Re: DNSWL question Jeff Chan 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 06:23:06 EDT
  • DNSWL question Mark Wendt (Contractor) 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 06:13:11 EDT
  • Re: Headers not being updated MartyG 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 05:49:49 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Loren Wilton 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 05:46:42 EDT
  • Re: way to change the header Banyan He 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 05:24:19 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Justin Mason 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 04:36:32 EDT
  • way to change the header cpayne 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 02:12:56 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Chris 'Xenon' Hanson 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 01:59:57 EDT
  • Re: SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Jeff Chan 
• Tue Oct 16 2007 - 01:53:09 EDT
  • SpamAssassin not hitting well on obvious spam Chris 'Xenon' Hanson 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 22:21:08 EDT
  • Re: Mailman cooler jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 22:15:43 EDT
  • Re: Question about total effective of spamassassin Matt Kettler 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 21:48:04 EDT
  • RE: Question about total effective of spamassassin Michael Scheidell 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 20:25:27 EDT
  • Re: Headers not being updated D Hill 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 19:39:13 EDT
  • Re: Headers not being updated Matt Kettler 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 19:34:22 EDT
  • Re: Mailman cooler [Was Re: unsubscribed] René Berber 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 18:52:21 EDT
  • Re: Mailman cooler [Was Re: unsubscribed] Mark Martinec 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 18:26:18 EDT
  • Headers not being updated MartyG 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 17:52:04 EDT
  • Re: Mailman cooler [Was Re: unsubscribed] Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 17:45:10 EDT
  • Mailman cooler [Was Re: unsubscribed] jidanni(at)jidanni.org 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 04:54:13 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Per Jessen 
• Mon Oct 15 2007 - 04:16:40 EDT
  • FuzzyOCR / Gifsicle errors Martin Svensson 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 21:47:29 EDT
  • Re: change mysql username in bayes_var table Rob Mangiafico 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 21:19:14 EDT
  • Re: change mysql username in bayes_var table Michael Parker 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 20:53:43 EDT
  • change mysql username in bayes_var table Rob Mangiafico 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 13:42:50 EDT
  • Re: Learn Ham/Spam to more than Bayes DB Magnus Anderson 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 12:30:18 EDT
  • Re: Learn Ham/Spam to more than Bayes DB Michael Parker 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 11:23:34 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 09:54:49 EDT
  • Question about total effective of spamassassin cpayne(at)webmail.magigames.net 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 09:31:12 EDT
  • Learn Ham/Spam to more than Bayes DB Magnus Anderson 
• Sun Oct 14 2007 - 02:21:46 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 23:46:51 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 23:39:19 EDT
  • Re: "Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/PTR.pm in @INC" Jose Mario Pires 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 23:36:15 EDT
  • Re: "Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/PTR.pm in @INC" Jose Mario Pires 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 23:15:08 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 23:05:11 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 22:48:15 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Karsten Bräckelmann 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 22:15:21 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Loren Wilton 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 12:43:05 EDT
  • RE: Global Bayes and AWL Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 12:43:52 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Justin Mason 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 11:40:12 EDT
  • Global Bayes and AWL Magnus Anderson 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 10:59:40 EDT
  • RE: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Michael Scheidell 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 10:47:57 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 10:34:52 EDT
  • RE: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Michael Scheidell 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 10:34:25 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 10:03:13 EDT
  • RE: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Michael Scheidell 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 09:59:04 EDT
  • Re: "Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/PTR.pm in @INC" Bob Proulx 
• Sat Oct 13 2007 - 08:11:38 EDT
  • Re: "Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/PTR.pm in @INC" mouss 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 21:31:21 EDT
  • "Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/PTR.pm in @INC" Jose Mario Pires 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 23:05:17 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 17:09:14 EDT
  • Re: sa-update channel detail Bob Proulx 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 16:54:47 EDT
  • RE: sa-update channel detail Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 16:32:20 EDT
  • Re: Timeout issues with recent updates Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 14:45:11 EDT
  • Timeout issues with recent updates Bret Miller 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 13:41:32 EDT
  • Re: Bayes only if -u specified? Jason Frisvold 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 13:41:02 EDT
  • Re: Bayes only if -u specified? Jason Frisvold 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 13:11:00 EDT
  • Re: sa-update channel detail Theo Van Dinter 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 13:07:14 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 13:06:45 EDT
  • Re: sa-update channel detail Bob Proulx 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:59:41 EDT
  • RE: sa-update channel detail Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:55:24 EDT
  • RE: sa-update channel detail Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:48:39 EDT
  • Re: sa-update channel detail Bob Proulx 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:46:49 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Bob Proulx 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:35:54 EDT
  • Re: Bayes only if -u specified? Michael Parker 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 12:11:09 EDT
  • RE: sa-update channel detail Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 11:47:15 EDT
  • Re: Bayes only if -u specified? John D. Hardin 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 11:32:03 EDT
  • Bayes only if -u specified? Jason Frisvold 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 10:36:55 EDT
  • Re: sa-update channel detail Matthias Haegele 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 10:05:44 EDT
  • sa-update channel detail Bowie Bailey 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 09:46:12 EDT
  • RE: MIPSpace Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 09:19:33 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Nigel Frankcom 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 09:14:53 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Evan Platt 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 08:25:33 EDT
  • Re: MIPSpace Matt Kettler 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 07:33:18 EDT
  • Re: unsubscribed Nigel Frankcom 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 06:15:31 EDT
  • unsubscribed Sebastian Graf 
• Fri Oct 12 2007 - 05:42:14 EDT
  • Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 23:28:09 EDT
  • Re: MIPSpace John Rudd 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 23:13:30 EDT
  • Re: MIPSpace Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 22:37:37 EDT
  • Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 22:29:42 EDT
  • Re: Are all cf files used in spamassassin Matt Kettler 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 18:35:56 EDT
  • SARE rule defects - and two others - one a 3.1.4 system rule (at the least) jdow 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 17:26:11 EDT
  • Re: where does include include from? Loren Wilton 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 17:15:20 EDT
  • Re: Deleting Spam (Linux & Procmail) mouss 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 16:22:31 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin mouss 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 16:19:00 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist mouss 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:52:16 EDT
  • Re: MIPSpace James 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:29:16 EDT
  • Re: Creating own DNS block list Mr Shunz 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:27:26 EDT
  • MIPSpace Rick Macdougall 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:07:02 EDT
  • Re: DOS_OE_TO_MX Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 14:03:28 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) jdow 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:59:54 EDT
  • Re: Are all cf files used in spamassassin jdow 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:10:48 EDT
  • Re: LashBack URL / BL? Bill Landry 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 13:06:37 EDT
  • Are all cf files used in spamassassin rdyes(at)monroehosp.org 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 12:53:00 EDT
  • Re: LashBack URL / BL? Kris Deugau 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 12:28:22 EDT
  • Creating own DNS block list kc99 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 11:07:51 EDT
  • DOS_OE_TO_MX Paolo De Marco 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:41:29 EDT
  • Re: LashBack URL / BL? Mikael Syska 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:27:46 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Mark Martinec 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:06:37 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 05:49:05 EDT
  • Re: Deleting Spam (Linux & Procmail) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 05:42:02 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Justin Mason 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 05:41:01 EDT
  • Re: where does include include from? Justin Mason 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 05:23:26 EDT
  • Re: Deleting Spam (Linux & Procmail) Gene Heskett 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 04:14:45 EDT
  • Deleting Spam (Linux & Procmail) Mark 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 03:22:47 EDT
  • Re: 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Per Jessen 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 02:49:58 EDT
  • Re: where does include include from? Per Jessen 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 02:04:18 EDT
  • 8bit encoding in mail header by SpamAssassin Lars Ippich 
• Thu Oct 11 2007 - 00:53:43 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 19:22:10 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist David B Funk 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 18:14:22 EDT
  • LashBack URL / BL? Dave Koontz 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 16:12:40 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] RE: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:11:22 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Michal Jeczalik 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 15:06:25 EDT
  • A compound bounce/(spf/dk/dkim) rule I'd like to see. Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 14:29:55 EDT
  • Updated patch on async events handling and DNS lookup completions for SA 3.2.3 Mark Martinec 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 13:41:55 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jeff Chan 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 13:08:28 EDT
  • RE: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Bret Miller 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 12:04:09 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist mouss 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 12:01:52 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist mouss 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 10:51:30 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Chris Edwards 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 08:50:02 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jeff Chan 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 08:57:39 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Leon Kolchinsky 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 08:24:47 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist R.Smits 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 05:08:00 EDT
  • Re: header lines being folded into one? Mark Martinec 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 04:53:33 EDT
  • Re: What I want to see in SA RBL support Mark Martinec 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:58:35 EDT
  • Re: What I want to see in SA RBL support John Rudd 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:43:56 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:41:37 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? Per Jessen 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:33:22 EDT
  • Re: What I want to see in SA RBL support Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:26:53 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? Per Jessen 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:15:59 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Jeff Chan 
• Wed Oct 10 2007 - 03:06:37 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jeff Chan 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 20:54:34 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist mouss 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 19:31:27 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jo Rhett 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 19:22:36 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Chris Edwards 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 19:09:43 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jo Rhett 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 18:52:32 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Chris Edwards 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 18:44:22 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jo Rhett 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 18:41:52 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jo Rhett 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 18:30:28 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) bgodette(at)idcomm.com 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 17:32:52 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 17:11:10 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Steven Kurylo 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 17:11:15 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? Loren Wilton 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:24:36 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 15:06:39 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Chris Edwards 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 15:06:04 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? John D. Hardin 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 15:04:35 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Rob McEwen 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:54:32 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Skip 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:55:58 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist James E. Pratt 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:19:40 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Jonas Eckerman 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:44:16 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? hamann.w(at)t-online.de 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:31:40 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Chris Edwards 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:25:47 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Skip 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:25:17 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Chris Edwards 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:24:37 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? John D. Hardin 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:22:22 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Richard Smits 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:19:36 EDT
  • Re: header lines being folded into one? Loren Wilton 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:14:14 EDT
  • Re: the IT job boarrd spam? Loren Wilton 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:08:23 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Aaron Wolfe 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 14:00:46 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Rob McEwen 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:56:33 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Ralf Hildebrandt 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:39:14 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Justin Mason 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:37:55 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist James E. Pratt 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:28:21 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Rob McEwen 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:26:57 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Jeff Chan 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:26:12 EDT
  • Re: SA choking? Richard Frovarp 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:23:04 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist D Hill 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:22:39 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Aaron Wolfe 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:17:32 EDT
  • SA choking? jason lingnau 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:16:31 EDT
  • RE: Advice on MTA blacklist Skip 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:13:13 EDT
  • Re: header lines being folded into one? Justin Mason 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 13:00:58 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist John Rudd 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 12:56:59 EDT
  • Re: Advice on MTA blacklist Byung-Hee HWANG 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 12:57:39 EDT
  • Re: header lines being folded into one? Per Jessen 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 11:34:10 EDT
  • Advice on MTA blacklist R.Smits 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 12:08:56 EDT
  • Re: header lines being folded into one? Mark Martinec 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 12:07:56 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Steven Kurylo 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 10:02:34 EDT
  • OT: Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Matthew Newton 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 09:20:41 EDT
  • the IT job boarrd spam? Igor Chudov 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 09:13:33 EDT
  • Spampd timeout on large message Ern 
• Tue Oct 09 2007 - 06:58:22 EDT
  • header lines being folded into one? Per Jessen 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 21:49:11 EDT
  • RE: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, Anthony Kamau 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 21:39:51 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, Rob McEwen 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 20:20:44 EDT
  • Re: sample-spam.txt different on two installations Bob Proulx 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 19:53:44 EDT
  • sample-spam.txt different on two installations Fernando Gutierrez 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 18:04:36 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, Bill Landry 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 17:56:05 EDT
  • What I want to see in SA RBL support John Rudd 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 17:41:23 EDT
  • RE: SSO's RHSBL Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 17:34:55 EDT
  • Re: SSO's RHSBL mouss 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 17:13:37 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 14:12:27 EDT
  • Re: Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Rob McEwen 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 13:33:52 EDT
  • Auto-RBL was: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 13:21:22 EDT
  • RE: SSO's RHSBL Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 13:17:05 EDT
  • Re: SSO's RHSBL Loren Wilton 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 12:59:43 EDT
  • Re: SSO's RHSBL Justin Mason 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 12:44:46 EDT
  • RE: SSO's RHSBL Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 12:30:13 EDT
  • Re: SSO's RHSBL Micah Anderson 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 11:55:20 EDT
  • Re: SSO's RHSBL Justin Mason 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 11:46:08 EDT
  • RE: SSO's RHSBL Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 11:30:25 EDT
  • Re: SSO's RHSBL ram 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 10:32:57 EDT
  • Re: New domains Jonas Eckerman 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 08:40:18 EDT
  • SSO's RHSBL Giampaolo Tomassoni 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 03:40:30 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Oct 08 2007 - 03:39:08 EDT
  • Re: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 14:48:35 EDT
  • Re: ispell Theo Van Dinter 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 13:05:04 EDT
  • RE: ispell Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 09:19:36 EDT
  • Re: ispell cpayne 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 09:12:03 EDT
  • RE: ispell Michael Scheidell 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 08:59:46 EDT
  • Re: ispell lists.spamassassin-user(at)duinheks.xs4all.nl 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 08:28:24 EDT
  • Re: ispell cpayne 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 08:17:04 EDT
  • ispell cpayne 
• Sun Oct 07 2007 - 05:55:48 EDT
  • Re: [sa-list] Re: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 13:30:31 EDT
  • Re: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Rob McEwen 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 13:52:34 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Steven 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:04:58 EDT
  • Re: Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 11:51:21 EDT
  • Why did this not hit more? (SPF, DKIM, Ironport, X-originating-ip) Dan Mahoney, System Admin 
• Sat Oct 06 2007 - 08:20:28 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Jonathan Armitage 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 14:30:30 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Tom Bombadil 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 14:24:09 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Loren Wilton 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 14:09:32 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Tom Bombadil 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 14:07:41 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Steven 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 13:29:13 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Tom Bombadil 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 06:42:53 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Dave Pooser 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 06:37:59 EDT
  • Re: newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Mr Shunz 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:08:40 EDT
  • newbie question: scan msgs smaller than certain size Gustavo Baratto 
• Fri Oct 05 2007 - 05:53:20 EDT
  • Re: [users] Clash of 2 SPF packages Justin Mason 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 22:44:06 EDT
  • Re: [users] Clash of 2 SPF packages Nigel Frankcom 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 20:18:30 EDT
  • Switching from local delivery to relay for Exchange? Henry Kwan 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 16:11:50 EDT
  • Re: Why'd Botnet hit? bgodette(at)idcomm.com 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:42:48 EDT
  • RE: FW: {Spam? Craig} Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body(SYM:37368083501226969515) Dan Barker 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:34:33 EDT
  • Re: FW: {Spam? Craig} Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body(SYM:37368083501226969515) Mike Jackson 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:21:22 EDT
  • FW: {Spam? Craig} Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message with an unscannable attachment or body(SYM:37368083501226969515) Dan Barker 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 15:06:56 EDT
  • Why'd Botnet hit? Dan Barker 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 07:00:34 EDT
  • where does include include from? Per Jessen 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 06:24:30 EDT
  • RE: OT: The Funny Side of Spam Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
• Thu Oct 04 2007 - 04:31:44 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Arthur Dent 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 21:33:55 EDT
  • Re: OT: The Funny Side of Spam Matthias Schmidt 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 15:31:52 EDT
  • [Fwd: Re: unable to run sa-learn utility as non-root user] Jonathan Armitage 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 11:55:49 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Rajkumar S 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 08:58:31 EDT
  • Re: unable to run sa-learn utility as non-root user Srilatha 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 12:44:26 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL bgodette(at)idcomm.com 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 12:39:29 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Theo Van Dinter 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 12:09:19 EDT
  • Re: OT: The Funny Side of Spam UxBoD 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 11:48:21 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 10:51:21 EDT
  • OT: The Funny Side of Spam Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 10:03:13 EDT
  • Re: unable to run sa-learn utility as non-root user Matt Kettler 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 09:13:06 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Rob Mangiafico 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 08:16:51 EDT
  • Re: unable to run sa-learn utility as non-root user Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 03:30:43 EDT
  • unable to run sa-learn utility as non-root user Srilatha 
• Wed Oct 03 2007 - 02:02:15 EDT
  • Security update for iXhash plugin Dirk Bonengel 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 19:09:11 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Steven Stern 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 15:29:04 EDT
  • RE: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Frank Niedermann 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 14:29:12 EDT
  • Re: MySpace Jules M 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 14:26:22 EDT
  • Re: Duplicate emails and increased spam getting through John D. Hardin 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 14:22:24 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter John D. Hardin 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 14:13:40 EDT
  • Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo John D. Hardin 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 14:00:13 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sekston filter Igor Chudov 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 13:56:33 EDT
  • RE: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Gary V 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 13:12:39 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Jerry Durand 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 13:01:18 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Bob Proulx 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 12:38:33 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Jerry Durand 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 12:33:11 EDT
  • Re: Localize Rule Jari Fredriksson 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 12:09:06 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Matthias Haegele 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 12:06:01 EDT
  • Re: Robert Sexton filter Theo Van Dinter 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 12:05:27 EDT
  • MySpace Peter P. Benac 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 11:58:26 EDT
  • Robert Sexton filter Steven Stern 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 09:41:00 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Frank Niedermann 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 09:37:56 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Frank Niedermann 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 08:43:49 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Matthias Haegele 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 08:42:52 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 08:23:44 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Frank Niedermann 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 08:01:13 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Mark Martinec 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 07:41:12 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) hanz 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 06:26:30 EDT
  • (no subject) mj romero 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 06:24:10 EDT
  • (no subject) mj romero 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 05:36:30 EDT
  • Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo Obantec Support 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 05:20:28 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Frank Niedermann 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 04:43:35 EDT
  • Re: Purpose for SpamAssassin using MySQL Micha³ Jêczalik 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 04:14:54 EDT
  • Re: pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Matthias Haegele 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 02:09:22 EDT
  • pyzor check failed (can't fork at Util.pm) Frank Niedermann 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 01:05:17 EDT
  • Re: Can't use spamassassin remotely Ted To 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:57:57 EDT
  • Re: Can't use spamassassin remotely Evan Platt 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:59:36 EDT
  • Re: Can't use spamassassin remotely Duane Hill 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:52:15 EDT
  • Re: Can't use spamassassin remotely Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:34:07 EDT
  • Can't use spamassassin remotely Ted To 
• Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:40:35 EDT
  • Re: Can't use spamassassin remotely Evan Platt 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 22:17:34 EDT
  • spammed by an anti-spam company: FW: Webinar: Ferris Research and Commtouch cordially invite you to a Reputation Services Webinar Michael Scheidell 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 20:07:23 EDT
  • Re: Thanks for your Email Address John D. Hardin 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 19:51:32 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) John Rudd 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 17:11:26 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 17:05:16 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) hanz 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 14:01:07 EDT
  • Re: Thanks for your Email Address Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 13:54:52 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 13:47:31 EDT
  • Re: Spammers who "did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA" Daryl C. W. O'Shea 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 13:41:46 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Jerry Durand 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 13:32:17 EDT
  • Spammers who "did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA" Igor Chudov 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 13:22:56 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Jerry Durand 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 11:49:28 EDT
  • Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo Matthias Häker 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 11:40:33 EDT
  • Re: is lock needed when using spamd/c combo John D. Hardin 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 10:53:11 EDT
  • Re: New domains mouss 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 10:36:49 EDT
  • Re: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED causing FN's Rolf Kraeuchi 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 10:31:31 EDT
  • Re: Discarding RBL-Mails, forwarding others mouss 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 09:58:03 EDT
  • is lock needed when using spamd/c combo Obantec Support 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 09:56:31 EDT
  • RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED causing FN's ram 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 09:44:31 EDT
  • Re: would you trust these people :) Clay Davis 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 09:32:45 EDT
  • RE: Low resource rules Martin.Hepworth 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 09:27:10 EDT
  • Re: New PayPal phish? Evan Platt 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 09:26:09 EDT
  • Re: Low resource rules Adam Wilbraham 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 07:57:16 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Loren Wilton 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 07:22:10 EDT
  • Exporting from Exchange for sa-learn? Paul Hutchings 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 05:24:45 EDT
  • Localize Rule Paolo De Marco 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 04:46:47 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 04:44:05 EDT
  • Re: Botnet 0.8 Plugin is available (FINALLY!!!) Matus UHLAR - fantomas 
• Mon Oct 01 2007 - 00:57:39 EDT
  • Re: A belly laugh is a *good* way to start the day mouss 

  This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 05 2008 - 22:04:08 EDT